Georgia Trial Evidence

It is so very important to put everything into trial of the case.  It is very difficult to win a case on appeal.  The case of Pounds v. State is a good example where the appellate court, here the Supreme Court of Georgia found error but still allowed a conviction to life in prison without parole to stand.

Can a witness testify to what another person told them even if the other person does not testify at trial?  The general rule is no they cannot.  The Supreme Court of Georgia determined it was error for the trial court to allow into trial the statements of an unavailable witness; however, the court found the error was harmless.  The Supreme Court allowed the conviction to stand.

In the Supreme Court of Georgia, decided: November 5, 2024, POUNDS v. THE STATE William C. Pounds III was convicted of malice murder and other crimes related to the shooting death of Kendra Jackson.  ​ He appealed, arguing that the trial court made several evidentiary errors and that his trial counsel was ineffective.

Background:

    • The crimes occurred on June 12, 2015.
    • ​Pounds was indicted in December 2015 and tried in October 2017. ​
    • He was found guilty and sentenced to life without parole for malice murder. ​
    • The felony murder count was vacated by law, and the aggravated assault count merged with the malice murder count for sentencing. ​
  1. Incident Details:
    • Pounds had relationships with both Jackson and another woman, Vicinda Crawford, for 10 years.​
    • On June 12, 2015, the day Pounds was supposed to marry Crawford, Jackson was found dead in Pounds’s home. ​
    • Pounds claimed Jackson committed suicide, but his accounts of the events were inconsistent.

Trial Evidence:

    • The State’s expert testified that Jackson did not have the gun in her hand and was not standing when shot.
    • ​Witnesses testified about Jackson’s positive outlook on life and her future plans, contradicting the suicide claim.
    • ​Jackson’s daughter testified about past incidents of violence (one of which was eight years old) by Pounds against Jackson.

Appeal Arguments:

    • Evidentiary Errors: Pounds claimed the trial court erred in admitting certain hearsay statements and other-acts evidence.
      1. The hearsay statements introduced at trial were made by Kendra Jackson to her coworkers, Laquisha Jordan and Jackie Bush.

Laquisha Jordan: Jordan testified that a few months before Jackson’s death, Jackson told her that she loved life, her kids, and had plans for the future. Jackson also said that if anyone ever claimed she committed suicide, Jordan should not believe it.

Jackie Bush: Bush testified that she reconnected with Jackson in April 2015.  Jackson expressed sadness about missing out on events in Bush’s life and was excited about participating in future events, such as shopping and decorating for Bush’s baby.

​These statements were admitted under the state-of-mind exception to the hearsay rule, but the court assumed, without deciding, that their admission might have been an error.  ​ However, any error was deemed harmless given the strong evidence against Pounds.

​The state of mind exception is a rule under the hearsay exceptions in the law of evidence.  Specifically, it allows for the admission of a statement that reflects the declarant’s then-existing state of mind, emotion, sensation, or physical condition.  This can include statements about the declarant’s intent, plan, motive, design, mental feeling, pain, or bodily health.  The purpose of this exception is to provide insight into the declarant’s state of mind at the time the statement was made, which can be relevant to understanding their actions or intentions.  The state of mind exception is referenced under OCGA § 24-8-803 (3).

    • Ineffective Counsel: Pounds argued his counsel was ineffective for not objecting to a juror who knew Jackson’s stepmother.​
  1. Conclusion:
    • The Supreme Court of Georgia affirmed the conviction, finding no reversible errors in the trial court’s decisions.

If you are looking to do a free consultation with a experienced Georgia criminal defense trial attorney please do not hesitate to contact our law office at 404-581-0999.

I got pulled over for a traffic violation and was told I have a warrant! What now?

It can be incredibly upsetting and unnerving to find out you have a warrant out for your arrest. If you are pulled over for speeding, expired tag, or other traffic violations, police officers run your name through a database that will notify them if you have an outstanding warrant for your arrest. This could be a warrant in the same county as your traffic offense, a different county in Georgia, or even a different state. Many times, police officers cannot tell you what crime the warrant alleges you committed and can only see what county or State the warrant is from.

What to do if you are told at a traffic stop that you have an outstanding warrant:

  • Be courteous to the officer
  • Do NOT make any statements about what the warrant is for, if you know, or any specific facts of the incident
  • Remember that everything you say to the officer is ON VIDEO- both from body-worn camera and cameras inside the police car
  • Understand that if the police officer tells you that you have a warrant, you MUST go with the officer. If you refuse, you risk being charged with additional crimes.
  • CONTACT US!

At the Law Offices of W. Scott Smith, our lawyers take pride in advocating for our clients’ constitutional rights, and we detail all options for our clients when defending their case. If you or a loved one has a pending criminal charge, please call our office today at 404-581-0999 for a free consultation.

Supreme Court of Georgia Clarifies Admissibility of Prior False Accusation Evidence

In a landmark decision on September 17, 2024, the Supreme Court of Georgia addressed the rules governing the admissibility of evidence concerning a victim’s allegedly false accusation of sexual misconduct against someone other than the defendant. The case, Gallegos-Munoz v. State, revolved around whether the trial court erred in excluding such evidence based solely on its determination that the evidence did not show a reasonable probability that the prior accusation was false.

Key Points of the Decision:

  • 2013 Evidence Code Prevails: The Court concluded that the rules set forth in Georgia’s 2013 Evidence Code govern the admissibility of prior-accusation evidence, superseding older decisional law that required a threshold determination of probable falsity.
  • Case Background: Gallegos-Munoz was convicted of child molestation based on accusations made by his girlfriend’s daughter. He sought to introduce evidence of a prior false accusation made by the victim against her biological father, which the trial court excluded.
  • Court’s Rationale: The Supreme Court vacated the Court of Appeals’ judgment, directing it to reconsider the admissibility of the prior-accusation evidence under the 2013 Evidence Code, specifically OCGA § 24-4-403 (Rule 403), which involves a balancing test of probative value versus prejudicial impact.

This ruling marks a significant step in clarifying the legal landscape for the admissibility of prior false accusation evidence in sex offense cases in Georgia.

The ruling emphasizes the application of Georgia’s 2013 Evidence Code, particularly OCGA § 24-4-403 (Rule 403). This means that courts must use the balancing test of probative value versus prejudicial impact when considering the admissibility of prior false accusation evidence, rather than relying on older decisional law.

Enhanced Defense Opportunities: Defendants in sex offense cases may have a better chance of introducing evidence of prior false accusations made by the victim. This can be crucial for building a defense, as it allows the jury to consider the credibility of the accuser more comprehensively.

Criminal defense Attorney Scott Smith and our law firm’s lawyers have the experience to combat these allegations with our proven record. If you or a loved one is facing a charge of rape and you feel as though the victim is laying and has lied in the past, it is imperative that you contact our office at 404-581-0999 for a free consultation.

Know Your Rights: What Police Can and Can’t Do in Searching an Automobile

Oftentimes, we get clients who have been pulled over by the police and ask to search their car. It’s important to know your rights and circumstances in which police can or cannot search your car.

  1. Probable Cause: Generally, police officers need probable cause to conduct a search of a vehicle without a warrant. Probable cause means that there is enough evidence to reasonably believe that a crime has been committed or that evidence of a crime can be found in the vehicle.
  2. Consent: If a police officer asks for consent to search a vehicle and the individual gives consent voluntarily, the officer can conduct the search without needing probable cause or a warrant. It’s important to note that you can not only refuse consent to the search, but you can also tell the officer which area(s) of the vehicle can and cannot be searched.
  3. Search Incident to Arrest: If a person is lawfully arrested, the police may search the area within the arrestee’s immediate control. In the case of a vehicle stop, this may include the passenger compartment of the vehicle, but not the trunk.
  4. Plain View: If a police officer sees evidence in the vehicle and it is immediately apparent that the evidence is something illegal, like narcotics, police can search and seize the evidence.
  5. Inventory Searches: If a vehicle is lawfully impounded, the police may conduct an inventory search of the vehicle’s contents.

If you’re pulled over call us immediately. Know your rights!

Pre-trial Diversion: What Is It?

Pre-trial diversion programs aim to provide individuals with an opportunity to address underlying issues that may have contributed to their involvement in a certain crime. It’s essentially an alternative pathway that allows for charges to be dismissed upon the completion of the program.

 

  • Eligibility: Not everyone is eligible. Pre-trial diversion programs are reserved for people in more minor offense crimes without an extensive criminal history.
  • Participation: If accepted, clients agree to participate in activities that include community service, drug and/or alcohol counseling, and educational programs like anger management classes or victim impact panels.
  • Supervision: Generally, participants are supervised by a case manager. If you are enrolled in a pre-trial diversion program, it is important to keep your case manager updated on any classes you’ve completed, or community service hours completed.
  • Consequences of failure: failure to comply with the program or committing another offense can result in reinstatement of the criminal charge and further prosecution.
  • Benefits: the main benefit of pre-trial diversion is to avoid criminal conviction. If you complete the program, your case and all the charges associated with the case are generally dismissed by the court. The program also provides an opportunity to rehabilitate behavior that could lead to further criminal convictions related to the original, underlying crime.

 

In general, pre-trial diversion programs offer a viable and attractive option for individuals who do not want a case to go to trial but want the charges dismissed by the court.

The Crucial Role of Hiring a Lawyer If You’ve Been Arrested in Atlanta

Facing arrest can be a harrowing experience, particularly in a bustling city like Atlanta, where legal procedures can be complex and consequences severe. In such situations, hiring a criminal defense lawyer is not just advisable; it’s imperative. Here’s why:

 

  1. **Legal Expertise**: Attorneys specializing in criminal defense possess extensive knowledge of the law, including local ordinances and courtroom procedures specific to Atlanta. They understand the nuances of the legal system, enabling them to build a robust defense strategy tailored to your case.

 

  1. **Protection of Rights**: When arrested, individuals are entitled to certain rights, such as the right to remain silent and the right to legal representation. A skilled lawyer ensures that your rights are upheld throughout the legal process, safeguarding you from potential abuses of power or procedural errors.

 

  1. **Strategic Counsel**: Lawyers analyze the details of your case, identifying strengths, weaknesses, and potential legal options. They provide strategic counsel on how to navigate the complexities of the legal system, including whether to plead guilty, negotiate a plea bargain, or proceed to trial.

 

  1. **Mitigation of Penalties**: In the event of conviction, attorneys work tirelessly to mitigate penalties and minimize the long-term consequences of criminal charges. This may involve negotiating reduced charges, advocating for alternative sentencing options, or pursuing avenues for rehabilitation and community service.

 

  1. **Evidence Examination**: Lawyers have the expertise to scrutinize evidence presented by the prosecution, identifying inconsistencies, inaccuracies, or violations of due process. They may uncover mitigating factors or exculpatory evidence that could strengthen your defense or lead to the dismissal of charges.

 

  1. **Emotional Support**: Being arrested can be emotionally taxing, causing stress, anxiety, and uncertainty about the future. A compassionate lawyer not only provides legal guidance but also offers emotional support, reassuring you and your loved ones during this challenging time.

 

  1. **Familiarity with Court System**: Local attorneys in Atlanta have established relationships with judges, prosecutors, and court personnel. This familiarity with the local court system can be advantageous, as it facilitates smoother communication, negotiation, and advocacy on behalf of their clients.

 

  1. **Preservation of Reputation**: A criminal record can have far-reaching implications, affecting employment opportunities, housing options, and personal relationships. By vigorously defending your case, lawyers strive to protect your reputation and minimize the stigma associated with criminal charges.

 

  1. **Cost-Effective in the Long Run**: While hiring a lawyer may incur upfront costs, the investment can save you money in the long run. Skilled legal representation increases the likelihood of a favorable outcome, potentially avoiding costly fines, lengthy imprisonment, or other financial repercussions associated with criminal convictions.

 

  1. **Peace of Mind**: Ultimately, hiring a lawyer provides peace of mind knowing that you have a knowledgeable advocate fighting for your rights and best interests. Whether navigating pre-trial negotiations, challenging evidence in court, or representing you at trial, a competent attorney can significantly impact the outcome of your case.

 

In conclusion, if you find yourself facing arrest in Atlanta, don’t underestimate the importance of hiring a qualified lawyer.  I have over 24 years of criminal experience. In our firm we have over 100 years of legal experience.  From protecting your rights to providing strategic counsel and emotional support, legal representation is indispensable in navigating the complexities of the criminal justice system and securing a brighter future.

 

Call our office for a free consultation today.

Recidivist Statute

A felony conviction has serious consequences. Punishment for a felony offense typically includes prison time, probation, fines, loss of constitutional rights and privileges, and a lifelong blemish on the person’s criminal record. Not only does a felony conviction impact the person’s ability to obtain employment and housing, but, under O.C.G.A. § 17-10-7, a prior felony conviction can be used to enhance a sentence on a new felony conviction. This article serves to explore the “Repeat Offenders” statute dealing with recidivist sentencing and Georgia’s ‘three strikes’ rule.

O.C.G.A. § 17-10-7 (a) – Recidivist Provision

If someone has one prior felony conviction and they are convicted of a felony a second time, the judge must to sentence the offender to the maximum term of imprisonment as set out in the statute they’ve been convicted of. However, the judge does have the discretion to probate or suspend that maximum sentence. Furthermore, in order to obtain a recidivist sentence under 17-10-7, the State must give the defendant clear notice before trial of its intention to seek such a sentence; the State must also prove that the prior conviction was for a crime which, if committed within Georgia, would be a felony.  Wheeler v. State, 270 Ga.App. 363 (2004).

O.C.G.A. § 17-10-7 (c) – Three Strikes Rule  

Any person who has been convicted of three felonies and commits a felony within Georgia shall, upon conviction for such fourth offense or for subsequent offenses, serve the maximum time provided for the sentence. The judge will not be able to reduce the sentence, the offender will not be eligible for parole until the maximum sentence has been served, and early release is unavailable. A person sentenced under the Three Strikes Rule will have to serve every day of the imposed sentence.

 

I take prescription medication. Can I drive?

The short answer is “it depends.” Most people correlate DUI conviction with alcohol. However, you can still be convicted of a DUI without having any alcohol in your system. Generally speaking, any sort of prescription medication that impairs and affects your driving could be the reason of a police officer stopping you. Typical prescription drugs that could lead to a DUI arrest are Xanax, certain antihistamines, sleep aids, and antidepressants. However, it is the burden of the State and the prosecutor to show that someone who takes prescription medicine is incapable of driving without being impaired.  If you are prescribed prescription medicine, consult with your doctor to determine if it would impair your driving and never take more than the prescribed dose.

Conditional Discharge or Drug First Offender

Conditional Discharge or Drug First Offender is a once in a lifetime opportunity that allows someone who has been charged for the first time with possessing drugs or a non-violent property crime related to drug or alcohol addiction to resolve their case without a felony conviction. The resolution will typically involve probation and some sort of rehabilitation and treatment. Once the terms of the sentence are completed successfully the case will be dismissed and will not be considered a conviction. Conditional discharge may still be available even if you have previously used first offender. Drug offenses can have significant collateral consequences. If you or a loved one has been charged with a drug offense, it is very important you speak with an experience attorney. Please give us a call at 404-581-0998 for a free case consultation.

First Offender in Fulton County

If you have been charged with a felony offense (with some exceptions) and have never pleaded guilty to or been convicted of a felony, you may be eligible for First Offender treatment under OCGA § 42-8-60. Charges that are considered serious violent felonies, e.g. murder, armed robbery, kidnapping, etc. and sexual offenses are not eligible for First Offender treatment.

First Offender allows you to enter a plea to the offense, but it is not considered a conviction. If you successfully complete all the terms of the sentence, the case will be discharged and you will be exonerated as a matter of law. This means that you can honestly say that you have not been convicted of a felony and all of your civil rights are restored.

This is a once in a lifetime opportunity and if you or a loved one has been charged with a felony offense and you think you might be eligible for First Offender, please give us a call at 404-581-0999.