Georgia Trial Evidence

/in , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , /by

It is so very important to put everything into trial of the case.  It is very difficult to win a case on appeal.  The case of Pounds v. State is a good example where the appellate court, here the Supreme Court of Georgia found error but still allowed a conviction to life in prison without parole to stand.

Can a witness testify to what another person told them even if the other person does not testify at trial?  The general rule is no they cannot.  The Supreme Court of Georgia determined it was error for the trial court to allow into trial the statements of an unavailable witness; however, the court found the error was harmless.  The Supreme Court allowed the conviction to stand.

In the Supreme Court of Georgia, decided: November 5, 2024, POUNDS v. THE STATE William C. Pounds III was convicted of malice murder and other crimes related to the shooting death of Kendra Jackson.  ​ He appealed, arguing that the trial court made several evidentiary errors and that his trial counsel was ineffective.

​Background:

    • The crimes occurred on June 12, 2015.
    • ​Pounds was indicted in December 2015 and tried in October 2017. ​
    • He was found guilty and sentenced to life without parole for malice murder. ​
    • The felony murder count was vacated by law, and the aggravated assault count merged with the malice murder count for sentencing. ​
  2. Incident Details:
    • Pounds had relationships with both Jackson and another woman, Vicinda Crawford, for 10 years.​
    • On June 12, 2015, the day Pounds was supposed to marry Crawford, Jackson was found dead in Pounds’s home. ​
    • Pounds claimed Jackson committed suicide, but his accounts of the events were inconsistent.

​Trial Evidence:

    • The State’s expert testified that Jackson did not have the gun in her hand and was not standing when shot.
    • ​Witnesses testified about Jackson’s positive outlook on life and her future plans, contradicting the suicide claim.
    • ​Jackson’s daughter testified about past incidents of violence (one of which was eight years old) by Pounds against Jackson.

​Appeal Arguments:

    • Evidentiary Errors: Pounds claimed the trial court erred in admitting certain hearsay statements and other-acts evidence.
      1. The hearsay statements introduced at trial were made by Kendra Jackson to her coworkers, Laquisha Jordan and Jackie Bush.

Laquisha Jordan: Jordan testified that a few months before Jackson’s death, Jackson told her that she loved life, her kids, and had plans for the future. Jackson also said that if anyone ever claimed she committed suicide, Jordan should not believe it.

Jackie Bush: Bush testified that she reconnected with Jackson in April 2015.  Jackson expressed sadness about missing out on events in Bush’s life and was excited about participating in future events, such as shopping and decorating for Bush’s baby.

​These statements were admitted under the state-of-mind exception to the hearsay rule, but the court assumed, without deciding, that their admission might have been an error.  ​ However, any error was deemed harmless given the strong evidence against Pounds.

​The state of mind exception is a rule under the hearsay exceptions in the law of evidence.  Specifically, it allows for the admission of a statement that reflects the declarant’s then-existing state of mind, emotion, sensation, or physical condition.  This can include statements about the declarant’s intent, plan, motive, design, mental feeling, pain, or bodily health.  The purpose of this exception is to provide insight into the declarant’s state of mind at the time the statement was made, which can be relevant to understanding their actions or intentions.  The state of mind exception is referenced under OCGA § 24-8-803 (3).

    • Ineffective Counsel: Pounds argued his counsel was ineffective for not objecting to a juror who knew Jackson’s stepmother.​
  2. Conclusion:
    • The Supreme Court of Georgia affirmed the conviction, finding no reversible errors in the trial court’s decisions.

If you are looking to do a free consultation with a experienced Georgia criminal defense trial attorney please do not hesitate to contact our law office at 404-581-0999.

Supreme Court of Georgia Clarifies Admissibility of Prior False Accusation Evidence

/in , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , /by

In a landmark decision on September 17, 2024, the Supreme Court of Georgia addressed the rules governing the admissibility of evidence concerning a victim’s allegedly false accusation of sexual misconduct against someone other than the defendant. The case, Gallegos-Munoz v. State, revolved around whether the trial court erred in excluding such evidence based solely on its determination that the evidence did not show a reasonable probability that the prior accusation was false.

Key Points of the Decision:

  • 2013 Evidence Code Prevails: The Court concluded that the rules set forth in Georgia’s 2013 Evidence Code govern the admissibility of prior-accusation evidence, superseding older decisional law that required a threshold determination of probable falsity.
  • Case Background: Gallegos-Munoz was convicted of child molestation based on accusations made by his girlfriend’s daughter. He sought to introduce evidence of a prior false accusation made by the victim against her biological father, which the trial court excluded.
  • Court’s Rationale: The Supreme Court vacated the Court of Appeals’ judgment, directing it to reconsider the admissibility of the prior-accusation evidence under the 2013 Evidence Code, specifically OCGA § 24-4-403 (Rule 403), which involves a balancing test of probative value versus prejudicial impact.

This ruling marks a significant step in clarifying the legal landscape for the admissibility of prior false accusation evidence in sex offense cases in Georgia.

The ruling emphasizes the application of Georgia’s 2013 Evidence Code, particularly OCGA § 24-4-403 (Rule 403). This means that courts must use the balancing test of probative value versus prejudicial impact when considering the admissibility of prior false accusation evidence, rather than relying on older decisional law.

Enhanced Defense Opportunities: Defendants in sex offense cases may have a better chance of introducing evidence of prior false accusations made by the victim. This can be crucial for building a defense, as it allows the jury to consider the credibility of the accuser more comprehensively.

Criminal defense Attorney Scott Smith and our law firm’s lawyers have the experience to combat these allegations with our proven record. If you or a loved one is facing a charge of rape and you feel as though the victim is laying and has lied in the past, it is imperative that you contact our office at 404-581-0999 for a free consultation.

Child Hearsay in Georgia

/in , , , , , , , , , /by

If you are charged with child molestation, cruelty to children, or any crime, in Georgia, where a child is the alleged victim, the State will fie a Motion to Admit Child Hearsay testimony.

This is pursuant to O.C.G.A. 24-8-820. This status is the Georgia Child Hearsay Statute.

O.C.G.A. 24-8-820 reads as follows:

(a) A statement made by a child younger than 16 years of age describing any act of sexual contact or physical abuse performed with or on such child by another or with or on another in the presence of such child shall be admissible in evidence by the testimony of the person to whom made if the proponent of such statement provides notice to the adverse party prior to trial of the intention to use such out-of-court statement and such child testifies at trial, unless the adverse party forfeits or waives such child’s testimony as provide in this title, and, at the time of the testimony regarding the out-of-court statements, the person to whom the child made such statement is subject to cross-examination regarding the out-of-court statements.

All that is required is:

  1. Notice to the defendant of the State’s intention to use such statements.
  2. The child testifying at trial, unless the defendant waives it.
  3. The person to whom the statements were made is subject to cross-examination.

You will need to be prepared to challenge the credibility and the underlying facts of any witness who takes the stand against you and claims that the child made statements to them about the sexual contact or physical abuse. Do not waive the child’s presence at trial. Make the child testify.

In cases of child molestation, there is rarely physical evidence. The entire case comes down to credibility. It is the defendant’s credibility vs. the child’s and the child’s witness’s credibility. Do not forfeit the right to a thorough cross-examination of the child and their witnesses.

These child hearsay witnesses can include testimony of physicians, investigators, parents, other family members, forensic interviewers and any other person who spoke to the child about the allegations.

You must be prepared to challenge each of these statements.

Child Molestation and Cruelty to Children carry severe penalties in Georgia. Do not make statements to the police about the allegations. You must hire a qualified attorney and be prepared to vigorously fight your case at trial.

Please call us at 404-581-0999 if you are charged with any crime involving a child in Georgia.

Know Your Rights: What Police Can and Can’t Do in Searching an Automobile

/in , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , /by

Oftentimes, we get clients who have been pulled over by the police and ask to search their car. It’s important to know your rights and circumstances in which police can or cannot search your car.

  1. Probable Cause: Generally, police officers need probable cause to conduct a search of a vehicle without a warrant. Probable cause means that there is enough evidence to reasonably believe that a crime has been committed or that evidence of a crime can be found in the vehicle.
  2. Consent: If a police officer asks for consent to search a vehicle and the individual gives consent voluntarily, the officer can conduct the search without needing probable cause or a warrant. It’s important to note that you can not only refuse consent to the search, but you can also tell the officer which area(s) of the vehicle can and cannot be searched.
  3. Search Incident to Arrest: If a person is lawfully arrested, the police may search the area within the arrestee’s immediate control. In the case of a vehicle stop, this may include the passenger compartment of the vehicle, but not the trunk.
  4. Plain View: If a police officer sees evidence in the vehicle and it is immediately apparent that the evidence is something illegal, like narcotics, police can search and seize the evidence.
  5. Inventory Searches: If a vehicle is lawfully impounded, the police may conduct an inventory search of the vehicle’s contents.

If you’re pulled over call us immediately. Know your rights!

Child Hearsay in Georgia

/in , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , /by

If you are charged with child molestation, cruelty to children, or any crime, in Georgia, where a child is the alleged victim, the State will fie a Motion to Admit Child Hearsay testimony.

This is pursuant to O.C.G.A. 24-8-820. This status is the Georgia Child Hearsay Statute.

O.C.G.A. 24-8-820 reads as follows:

(a) A statement made by a child younger than 16 years of age describing any act of sexual contact or physical abuse performed with or on such child by another or with or on another in the presence of such child shall be admissible in evidence by the testimony of the person to whom made if the proponent of such statement provides notice to the adverse party prior to trial of the intention to use such out-of-court statement and such child testifies at trial, unless the adverse party forfeits or waives such child’s testimony as provide in this title, and, at the time of the testimony regarding the out-of-court statements, the person to whom the child made such statement is subject to cross-examination regarding the out-of-court statements.

All that is required is:

  1. Notice to the defendant of the State’s intention to use such statements.
  2. The child testifying at trial, unless the defendant waives it.
  3. The person to whom the statements were made is subject to cross-examination.

You will need to be prepared to challenge the credibility and the underlying facts of any witness who takes the stand against you and claims that the child made statements to them about the sexual contact or physical abuse. Do not waive the child’s presence at trial. Make the child testify.

In cases of child molestation, there is rarely physical evidence. The entire case comes down to credibility. It is the defendant’s credibility vs. the child’s and the child’s witness’s credibility. Do not forfeit the right to a thorough cross-examination of the child and their witnesses.

These child hearsay witnesses can include testimony of physicians, investigators, parents, other family members, forensic interviewers and any other person who spoke to the child about the allegations.

You must be prepared to challenge each of these statements.

Child Molestation and Cruelty to Children carry severe penalties in Georgia. Do not make statements to the police about the allegations. You must hire a qualified attorney and be prepared to vigorously fight your case at trial.

Please call us at 404-581-0999 if you are charged with any crime involving a child in Georgia.

Recidivist Statute

/in , , , , , , , , , , , , /by

A felony conviction has serious consequences. Punishment for a felony offense typically includes prison time, probation, fines, loss of constitutional rights and privileges, and a lifelong blemish on the person’s criminal record. Not only does a felony conviction impact the person’s ability to obtain employment and housing, but, under O.C.G.A. § 17-10-7, a prior felony conviction can be used to enhance a sentence on a new felony conviction. This article serves to explore the “Repeat Offenders” statute dealing with recidivist sentencing and Georgia’s ‘three strikes’ rule.

O.C.G.A. § 17-10-7 (a) – Recidivist Provision

If someone has one prior felony conviction and they are convicted of a felony a second time, the judge must to sentence the offender to the maximum term of imprisonment as set out in the statute they’ve been convicted of. However, the judge does have the discretion to probate or suspend that maximum sentence. Furthermore, in order to obtain a recidivist sentence under 17-10-7, the State must give the defendant clear notice before trial of its intention to seek such a sentence; the State must also prove that the prior conviction was for a crime which, if committed within Georgia, would be a felony.  Wheeler v. State, 270 Ga.App. 363 (2004).

O.C.G.A. § 17-10-7 (c) – Three Strikes Rule  

Any person who has been convicted of three felonies and commits a felony within Georgia shall, upon conviction for such fourth offense or for subsequent offenses, serve the maximum time provided for the sentence. The judge will not be able to reduce the sentence, the offender will not be eligible for parole until the maximum sentence has been served, and early release is unavailable. A person sentenced under the Three Strikes Rule will have to serve every day of the imposed sentence.

 

Conditional Discharge or Drug First Offender

/in , , , , , , , , , , , , , , /by

Conditional Discharge or Drug First Offender is a once in a lifetime opportunity that allows someone who has been charged for the first time with possessing drugs or a non-violent property crime related to drug or alcohol addiction to resolve their case without a felony conviction. The resolution will typically involve probation and some sort of rehabilitation and treatment. Once the terms of the sentence are completed successfully the case will be dismissed and will not be considered a conviction. Conditional discharge may still be available even if you have previously used first offender. Drug offenses can have significant collateral consequences. If you or a loved one has been charged with a drug offense, it is very important you speak with an experience attorney. Please give us a call at 404-581-0998 for a free case consultation.

Trafficking at Airport

/in , , , , , , , , , , , /by

Trafficking marijuana or cocaine at the Atlanta airport is a serious offense.  Our law firm has successfully handled hundreds of these cases in Clayton County.  The first step in successfully handling these cases is knowing the law.

Let’s take a hypothetical situation that we see often in our drug trafficking cases from the Atlanta airport.  Hypothetically speaking, John Passenger arrived in the Atlanta airport on  a flight from the Dominican Republic. After disembarking, he did not follow the other passengers but began wandering aimlessly in the seating area next to the gate. Two Clayton County police officers, Officer Slammer and Officer Book’em, had been informed that John Passenger would be on the flight. The officers were dressed in plain clothes, with no weapons visible. They approached John Passenger from behind, and one officer said, “Excuse me, sir, I’m a police officer. Can I talk to you for a minute?” John Passenger turned and responded, “Yes,” in English, but when the officers asked him if he spoke English, he smiled and responded in English that he did not. John Passenger told the officers, through an interpreter, that he was in Atlanta for personal reasons and that he was employed as a construction worker. Officer Slammer asked to see the palms of John Passenger’s hands, and he saw that they were smooth and free of calluses. At this point, John Passenger began to appear very nervous; his hands shook and he began to sweat.

Officer Slammer explained to John Passenger that he was a narcotics officer; he asked permission to search John Passenger and his luggage, but John Passenger agreed to a search of his person only and not of his luggage. When asked why he was hesitant to allow his luggage to be searched, John Passenger replied that it contained X-rated material and women’s lingerie and that he would be embarrassed by a search. Agent Officer Book’em asked if John Passenger would rather have a drug sniffing dog check the luggage for narcotics, and John Passenger said that he would rather have a dog check the luggage. They proceeded to baggage claim, where the defendant’s bag was located.

Agent Officer Slammer called for a dog from the Tri-City Narcotics Unit. He also told John Passenger he was not under arrest. The K-9 unit arrived less than 15 minutes later, and the agents arranged for the dog, named K-9 Drug Dog, to check a line of four bags, including John Passenger’s luggage.  K-9 Drug Dog alerted to John Passenger’s bag. The officers again asked John Passenger if he would agree to a search of the bag. John Passenger responded that he would agree only if he could do the search himself, but the officers did not agree to this proposal. Officer Slammer then ordered John Passenger detained. The officers took him and the bag to the narcotics office, where Agent Espana, who spoke Spanish, informed John Passenger of his Miranda rights. The officers obtained a search warrant for the bag. Inside, they found five kilos of cocaine.

This hypothetical was taken from a real case.  Clearly, John Passenger did not adequately protect his rights in that he agreed to allow a k-9 dog at the Atlanta airport to do a free air sniff around his bag.  Second, he agreed to go with officers to allow the K-9 to sniff his luggage.  Lastly, he agreed to allow officers to search his bag without a warrant.  Obviously, even if you are not trafficking drugs at the airport, you should always protect your rights and never consent to a search unless it is requested by TSA for security purposes in order for you to fly.  Secondly, you should always be polite and respectful of law enforcement when you decline to permit them to search your luggage or walk with them to a location you do not want to go.  If they tell you you are under arrest then obviously comply with their commands.

One hopes a bad thing will not happen to you as you are travelling through Atlanta’s International Airport, but sometimes bad things happen to unassuming innocent people.  If you find that law enforcement has charged you with Trafficking Cocaine or Trafficking Marijuana at the Atlanta airport by searching your luggage and finding drugs, it is important that you hire a skilled criminal defense attorney to represent you if you are charged with this offense. The lawyers at our law office are experienced at defending these types of crimes and will work tirelessly to discover defenses in your case and protect you from these severe punishments. Call our office today at 404-581-0999 for a free consultation.

What is First offender and can I use it?

/in , , , , , , , , , , , /by

What is it? First offender treatment allows you to enter a guilty plea, but it is not considered a conviction. If you successfully complete all the terms of the sentence, the case will be dismissed, and you will be exonerated as a matter of law. This means that you can honestly say that you have not been convicted of a crime and all your civil rights are restored.

Can I use it? The answer is a lawyer’s favorite, it depends. If you have been charged with a crime and have never pleaded guilty to or been convicted of a felony, you may be eligible for First offender treatment under OCGA § 42-8-60. There are certain charges that, by statute, the answer is an automatic no. Offenses considered serious violent felonies (murder, armed robbery, kidnapping, etc.), most sex crimes, and DUI are not eligible. While, it can be used on both misdemeanor and felony offenses, it is generally advised not to use it on misdemeanors. However, every case is different. First offender is a once in a lifetime chance and once you use it, you can never use it again. It is important to discuss all your options with an attorney before making the decision to use or decline first offender.

What else should you know? The decision to grant first offender is entirely up to the judge; even if you are eligible there are times that a judge will not allow it. There are risks to using first offender. If you violate probation, the judge has the right to bring you back, adjudicate you guilty and resentence you to the maximum punishment with credit for the time you were on probation. For example, your sentence is 5 years, the max for the offense is 10 years and you violate your probation after 2 years. The judge can increase your sentence from 5 years to 10 years, but you would get credit for the 2 years. That would leave you with 8 years left and you would be a convicted felon. Now, that doesn’t mean that just because you violate your probation the judge will automatically do that. It really comes down to what the violation is. This makes it very important to have an attorney with you for any sort of probation revocation proceeding.

First Offender in Fulton County

/in , , , , , , , , , , , , /by

If you have been charged with a felony offense (with some exceptions) and have never pleaded guilty to or been convicted of a felony, you may be eligible for First Offender treatment under OCGA § 42-8-60. Charges that are considered serious violent felonies, e.g. murder, armed robbery, kidnapping, etc. and sexual offenses are not eligible for First Offender treatment.

First Offender allows you to enter a plea to the offense, but it is not considered a conviction. If you successfully complete all the terms of the sentence, the case will be discharged and you will be exonerated as a matter of law. This means that you can honestly say that you have not been convicted of a felony and all of your civil rights are restored.

This is a once in a lifetime opportunity and if you or a loved one has been charged with a felony offense and you think you might be eligible for First Offender, please give us a call at 404-581-0999.