Posts

Prior False Allegations Are Admissible in a Sex Offense Case

/in , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , /by

You are accused with child molestation or rape and your accuser has previously falsely accused another person of these horrific crimes. Can you bring up these prior false accusations in your case? The answer is yes.

The Georgia Supreme Court held in State v. Burns, that a defendant in a sexual-offense prosecution may bring up evidence that the alleged victim has previously made false accusations of sexual misconduct. This evidence is admissible to attack the credibility of the victim and show that the current charges did not occur.

In this case, James Burns was charged with aggravated sexual battery, aggravated sodomy, and incest. It was discovered that the alleged victim had made up a prior rape allegation.

The Rape Shield Statute of Georgia does not prohibit testimony of previous false allegations by a victim. This is because prior false accusations establish that the victim has a propensity to make false statements regarding sexual misconduct. The Rape Shield Statute in Georgia is designed to prohibit bringing up the victim’s past sexual conduct. But it does not protect the victim in cases where a false allegation was made.

A criminal defendant has a Sixth Amendment right to make a full defense. A defendant has the right to bring up prior false allegations where it can be shown that the allegation was indeed false. The Sixth Amendment also grants the defendant the right of confrontation. This includes the right to physically face the person who is testifying against him and the right to conduct a thorough cross-examination. A defendant is guaranteed the opportunity for effective cross-examination.

In addition, the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment guarantees a criminal defendant a meaningful opportunity to present a complete defense. The defendant does not have a right to offer any testimony that is either privileged, irrelevant or excluded under the rules of evidence. However, if the defendant has evidence of a prior false allegation of the alleged victim then it is admissible in order to protect the integrity of the trial.

In State v. Burns, the Georgia Supreme Court has made a bright line rule that prior false allegations are admissible, regardless of other rules of evidence.

If you are charged with aggravated child molestation, child molestation, sexual battery, rape or any other sexual offense in Georgia, it is imperative that you aggressively defend yourself and learn everything you can about the alleged victim. If the alleged victim in your case has ever made up an allegation against any other person, you must use this information to your advantage when confronting your accuser in court.

If you are charged with any sexual offense in Georgia, please contact us at 404-581-0999

Seizures; The Three Tiers of Police-Citizen Encounters under Georgia Law

/in /by

In assessing Fourth Amendment issues in a given case, lawyers should be cognizant of the three tiers of police-citizen encounters. These different levels of police encounters are meant to balance a person’s reasonable expectation of privacy against society’s legitimate interest in enforcing criminal laws. These tiers are designed to establish when, where, and how police should interact with members of the public in accordance with constitutional law. This article will explain the three tiers and the legal rules surrounding them.

 

1st Tier Encounters

 

In a 1st tier encounter, or “mere encounter,” between a person and a police officer, a person is not considered to be “seized” for 4th Amendment purposes. U.S. v. Mendenhall, 446 U.S. 544 (1980). This is because 1st tier encounters are when citizens and police come into voluntary contact with each other.  A “seizure” of a person only occurs when a reasonable person in the citizen’s situation would not feel free to “disregard the police and go about his business.” Florida v. Bostick, 501 U.S. 429 (1991). To determine whether a seizure has occurred, a judge will analyze the encounter to determine if there was a show of authority or an application of physical force. California v. Hodari D., 499 U.S. 621 (1991).

 

2nd Tier Encounters

 

A 2nd tier encounter is referred to as an “investigative detention.” The most common situation is when a police officer pulls you over in your car. This is also referred to as a “stop.” Under this tier, a police officer may seize a person for investigative purposes if the officer has reasonable suspicion to believe a crime has been or is about to be committed AND the officer may conduct a limited pat down or frisk of a lawfully seized person if there is a reasonable belief the person is armed and dangerous. Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968).

 

“Reasonable Suspicion” is more than an unparticularized hunch, but less than probable cause. These investigative detentions must be temporary, lasting no longer than necessary to effectuate their purpose and terminate once the suspicion has been dispelled.

 

3rd Tier Encounters

 

The 3rd tier contemplates the arrest of a person. A person is under arrest if he is not free to leave and a reasonable person in his situation would not think the detention was temporary. Williams v. State, 293 Ga. App. 842 (2008). Because an arrest is more intrusive than a stop, this tier requires more legal justification. Here, the standard of proof is “probable cause.” Probable cause to arrest exists when facts and circumstances based on reasonably trustworthy information would lead a prudent person in believing that a suspect is committing, has committed, or is about to commit a crime. Beck v. Ohio, 379 U.S. 89 (1964). Probable cause is a “fair probability,” less than a preponderance of evidence, but greater than reasonable suspicion. Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 (1983).

 

If law enforcement officers violate the above rules, certain evidence in the case may be suppressed (ruled inadmissible) by a judge upon a motion to suppress.

 

Contact Us

 

If you or someone you know has been charged with a crime, please contact our office today at 404-581-0999 for a free consultation.