Posts

I take prescription medication. Can I drive?

/in , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , /by

The short answer is “it depends.” Most people correlate DUI conviction with alcohol. However, you can still be convicted of a DUI without having any alcohol in your system. Generally speaking, any sort of prescription medication that impairs and affects your driving could be the reason of a police officer stopping you. Typical prescription drugs that could lead to a DUI arrest are Xanax, certain antihistamines, sleep aids, and antidepressants. However, it is the burden of the State and the prosecutor to show that someone who takes prescription medicine is incapable of driving without being impaired.  If you are prescribed prescription medicine, consult with your doctor to determine if it would impair your driving and never take more than the prescribed dose.

DUI: Drugs

/in , , , , , /by

DUI drugs charges can be a source of confusion for defendants and lawyers alike. This article will explore these laws and explain their meaning, what must be proven, how they are proven, and how to defend against them.

There are three ways to charge DUI Drugs cases: (1) DUI Drugs – Less Safe; (2) DUI Drugs – Per Se; and (3) DUI Drugs – Combined Effect.

DUI Drugs – Less Safe

Georgia law prohibits a person from driving a vehicle while under the influence of any drug to the extent that it is less safe for the person to drive. O.C.G.A. 40-6-391(a)(2). This “less safe” statute requires proof (beyond a reasonable doubt) that the quantity or amount of the prescribed, illicit, or even over-the-counter drug in the person’s system caused impairment or rendered the person to be a “less safe driver.” Therefore, a person can be prosecuted even though the drugs were legally prescribed or were provided over-the-counter, so long as consuming those drugs caused you to be a less safe driver.

The “less safe” provision is the most common way DUI drugs charges are prosecuted. The State is not required to prove the accused had a particular level of drugs in their system. As a result, the State may prosecute even though no chemical test exists. The arresting officer will look for the following indications of impairment:

  • Admitting to using drugs
  • Bloodshot or watery eyes
  • Slurred or slow speech
  • Presence of drugs in vehicle or on person
  • Bad driving
  • Poor performance on Standardized Field Sobriety Tests

The key to defending these “less safe” drugs cases is raising doubt as to whether the drugs taken were the actual cause of the bad driving complained of. This causation element is something the State is required to prove. There are many reasons for bad driving unrelated to the consumption of drugs. In addition, defense counsel should raise challenges to the arresting officer’s training and experience in detecting and investigating DUI Drugs cases. In many instances, the arresting officer does not have the degree of training required to properly investigate these cases such as an officer who is qualified as a Drug Recognition Expert (DRE). Furthermore, defense counsel should raise a Harper challenge to the scientific validity of the Romberg Field Sobriety test if that test was performed by the accused. [1]

DUI Drugs – Per Se

Georgia law makes it illegal for a person to operate a vehicle while there is any amount of marijuana or a controlled substance, as defined in O.C.G.A. § 16-13-21, present in the person’s blood or urine, or both, including the metabolites and derivatives of each or both without regard to whether any alcohol is present in the person’s breath or blood. O.C.G.A. 40-6-391(a)(6).

Given the language of the law, the mere presence of a drug (prescribed or not) will constitute a violation of this code section. The question becomes how an arresting officer would know whether the accused had a valid prescription or not? Without an admission, this would be difficult for a prosecutor to prove.

Issues of proof aside, Love v. State, 271 Ga. 398 (1999), has essentially wiped out the “DUI Drugs – Per Se” law entirely. The Love case held that O.C.G.A. § 40-6-391(a)(6), was too broadly drawn, as it incriminates both legal and non-legal users of marijuana, constituting a violation of the Equal Protection clause of both the Georgia and United States Constitutions. This is the primary reason most DUI Drugs cases are prosecuted as “Less Safe” cases.

What remains of the DUI Drugs – Per Se statute is to punish those cases where someone is driving with drugs in their system which offer no lawful use (cocaine, heroin, etc.).

DUI Drugs – Combined Influence

Under O.C.G.A. § 40-6-391(a)(4), a person is prohibited from driving a vehicle while under the influence of any two or more of the substances provided in the DUI code section (alcohol, drugs, or toxic vapors) to the extent it is less safe for the person to drive.

Again, we see the State being required to prove the accused was a less safe driver because of the combined effects of two or more intoxicants (alcohol and drugs – prescribed or not). Although these cases present greater challenges, a skilled attorney can raise doubt as to whether the combined effect of intoxicants actually caused less safe driving.  

If you or someone you know has been arrested for driving under the influence, contact the law firm of W. Scott Smith at 404.581.0999 today for a free case evaluation. You’ll find a local Atlanta DUI attorney ready to aggressively fight on your behalf. You can also find out more detailed information about Atlanta laws here.

[1] The Romberg test consists of the subject tilting their head back, closing their eyes, and counting in their head until the subject believes thirty seconds has elapsed and then telling the officer when they believe those thirty seconds had elapsed.

Drug Defense

/in , , /by

Here are the most common defenses in Georgia to drug charges:

Unlawful Search and Seizure

The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and Paragraphs One and Eight of the Georgia Constitution guarantees the right to due process of law, including lawful search and seizure procedures prior to an arrest. Search and seizure issues are very common in drug possession cases.   The vast majority of our wins have come from our extensive knowledge of Georgia Law and the limitations law enforcement are required to follow.

Mischarged Drug Case

We commonly see someone charged with offenses they didn’t commit.  Examples include Possession with Intent to Distribute where the drugs seized were for personal use.  Other examples can include where the drugs are misidentified.  The drug analyst then must testify at trial in order for the prosecution to make its case.

Drugs Belong to Someone Else

A common defense to any crime charge is to simply say you didn’t possess it or the drugs were not yours. In Georgia, possession can be constructive but that still requires the State to prove you intended to possess the drugs.

Entrapment

While law enforcement is free to set up drug buys, entrapment occurs when officers or informants induce a suspect to commit a crime he or she otherwise may not have committed. If an informant pressures a suspect into passing drugs to a third party then this may be considered entrapment.

Call us today

Our goals are to meet your goals.  Some clients want to avoid prison.  Other clients want to protect their criminal history and the collateral consequences that can be so harmful as a result of a drug conviction.  Whatever the goal, we will do everything in our power to meet your goals. 

by Scott Smith

Possession of Drug Related Objects

/in , , , , /by

What’s a drug related object?

It is not uncommon for an officer to search your car or home and not only arrest you for the marijuana or drugs they found, but also for Possession of Drug Related Objects. In Georgia, under O.C.G.A. § 16-13-32.2, it is illegal to possess objects used to smoke, store, ingest, manufacture, and conceal drugs with. The most common drug related object we defend against are the use of pipes, but other examples are syringes, grinders, and scales. Possession of a drug related object is a misdemeanor charge in Georgia, and can carry up to 12 months in jail and a $1,000 fine. Even if the pipe or other item does not have any residue in it, you can still be arrested. Even if there were no drugs found in the car, police officers will routinely arrest you nonetheless for any drug related object that comes up in the search.

What will my case look like?

The defense in these cases vary, but if the officer finds the paraphernalia or drug related object as a result of an unlawful search, then the drugs and the drug objects can be suppressed as what is referred to as fruit of the poisonous tree. Examples of unlawful searches include those without a warrant in some circumstances, or those with faulty search warrants. An experienced and aggressive criminal defense attorney can attack the search and seizure of the drug paraphernalia or drugs found during a search by police officers. If you or a loved one has been charged with possession of drugs or possession of drug related objects in Georgia, call us today for a FREE CONSULTATION at 404-581-0999.

by Mary Agramonte

Peach State Lawyer’s Marijuana Blog Series Part 1: Don’t Smoke and Drive

/in /by

When you google: “legal marijuana in Georgia” the results seem endless.  That’s probably because the legalization of marijuana has become one of today’s hottest political and social issues.  Everywhere you turn, the “marijuana” debate is front and center. In fact, CNN, Fox News, and other major news sources have been exploring the topic on a daily basis–presenting opinions about and predicting the effects of marijuana legalization.

Georgians have also joined the debate.   Supporters of marijuana legalization in Georgia have been vocal about the drug’s medicinal benefits and the industry’s potential profitability. Additionally, supporters have been calling for an end to the criminalization of marijuana possession, comparing it “Prohibition,” which ended in 1920. Those who are against the legalization of marijuana argue that marijuana is a gateway drug that will lead to widespread drug abuse and make our communities less safe.

What makes this debate so fascinating is the fact that there is bipartisan interest in legalization. Just recently, Georgia House Speaker, David Ralston, a conservative Republican, announced that even he would be interested in learning more about the medical benefits to marijuana and how Georgia can incorporate the legalization of marijuana into its own law.

Since we are still a few years away from legalization of marijuana in Georgia, it is important to understand how Georgia handles DUI-marijuana cases in the meantime.

CURRENT GEORGIA LAW AND DUI-MARIJUANA CASES

Georgia has already addressed driving under the influence of marijuana to some extent. Currently, the crime falls under Georgia’s broad DUI-drug statute. This statute allows a police officer to place a driver under arrest for DUI if the police officer believes a driver is under the influence of ANY drug (prescription or not) and that the drug is causing the driver to be a “less safe” driver.

There are a few different ways the officer can try to establish a case for DUI drugs and more specifically driving under the influence of marijuana.

First, the officer is trained to look for all the tell-tale signs that someone is high on marijuana.   Think about the people you knew growing up that liked to smoke marijuana. They often would have slower speech, blood shot eyes and a carefree attitude. Sometimes, marijuana smokers cannot control their laughter either. In addition to personal characteristics, police officers often include the smell of burnt marijuana as evidence of DUI-marijuana. Throughout any given investigation, police officers are looking for each and all of these signs.

Often times, police officers do not see all of the above-mentioned characteristics and therefore struggle to find probable cause to arrest a driver for DUI-Drugs.

In these situations, police officers are trained to establish a DUI-drugs case using the National Highway and Traffic Safety Administration’s (NHTSA) marijuana field sobriety test.  NHTSA, as you may know, is the federal agency tasked with designing field sobriety tests and training police officers to administer those tests in the most objective and scientifically accurate manner possible. Even though NHTSA has that responsibility, NHTSA is known for launching aggressive anti-DUI ad campaigns. In one ad, there is a car filled to the brim with beer and liquor. In another ad, there is an invisible police officer who stalks bar patrons as they head to their cars in an inebriated condition and drive recklessly on public roads. Georgia, like many other states, uses NHTSA’s manual to train its police officers on DUI investigation.

When a Georgia police officer believes a driver is impaired but cannot immediately determine what substance is causing the impairment, the officer is trained to conduct the DUI-Alcohol field sobriety tests.  If it appears that alcohol is not the reason why someone seems to be impaired, then the officer is trained to go into additional field sobriety tests to narrow down the potential causes of the impairment.  With these results, police officers can then make a determination as to whether there is probable cause (more likely than not) that the driver is under the influence of marijuana.

WHAT ABOUT MY LICENSE?

The post-arrest process for DUI drugs is very similar to a DUI alcohol arrest.   If an officer wants the driver to undergo additional chemical testing (which they almost always do), the officer MUST read the Georgia Implied Consent warning to the driver immediately after he is arrested. Basically, the Georgia Implied Consent warning tells the driver that his license is going to be suspended if he refuses to provide a sample of his blood, breath or urine.  In DUI-Alcohol cases, a breath test is the most popular form of chemical testing because it provides the officer with a quick, but not always accurate, printout of the drivers blood alcohol concentration. However, in DUI drug cases, a blood test is usually preferred because it can detect a variety of intoxicants–not just alcohol. Urine tests are rarely used in DUI investigations because the results have been found to be less accurate.

In Georgia, if a driver agrees to take a blood test, the driver will be taken to a nurse or phlebotomist who will then administer the blood draw.  If the driver agrees to the test then the blood will be packaged and sent to the Georgia Bureau of Investigations (GBI) crime lab, where it is tested for the presence of marijuana and other intoxicants. When looking for marijuana in a blood sample, GBI looks for the mere presence of THC, the active chemical in marijuana that causes a person to feel high. GBI does not, however, examine or ascertain the level of THC in a person’s blood. So, if a driver smoked marijuana a week prior to getting behind the wheel and still had THC in their system, then that drivers GBI report would read the same as the driver who smoked while driving.