When Does a Prosecutor Have to Disclose a Deal Made with a Witness in Exchange for Testimony?

Often, the State will work with co-defendants to offer them a favorable plea deal to testify against another defendant. But, is the prosecutor required to disclose these deals to the other co-defendants or the jury during the trial?  The short answer is found in a 1963 United States Supreme Court case called Brady v. Maryland (373 U.S. 83). The State is required to turn over any evidence that meets four prongs: the evidence must be favorable to the defendant, the defendant must have been unable to obtain the evidence himself, the State must have suppressed the favorable evidence, and, had the evidence been disclosed to the defense, there must have been a reasonable probability that the outcome of the trial would have been different. Williamson v. State, 300 Ga. App. 538 (2009); Brannon v. State, 298 Ga. 601 (2016).

How does this rule apply to statements made by co-defendants in exchange for favorable plea deals?   A co-defendant’s statement could become favorable to a defendant if it calls into question a co-defendant’s credibility. In Byrd v. Owen, 272 Ga. 807 (2000), the Georgia Supreme Court found that the prosecutor was obligated to disclose an immunity agreement it made with its main witness, who was the defendant’s partner in drug trafficking. The Court found that the deal should have been disclosed because, if the defense could have discredited the witness’s testimony (and ultimately shown that he had incentive to lie to get a plea deal), there was a substantial likelihood that the outcome of the trial would have been different. Additional Georgia Supreme Court cases like Schofield v. Palmer, 279 Ga. 848 (2005) tell us that because the reliability of a particular witness may be determinative of guilt or innocence, impeachment evidence, including evidence about any deals or agreements between the State and the witness, falls within the Brady rule, which requires the prosecution to disclose favorable evidence that is material either to guilt or to punishment.

All of this means that if you are charged with a serious crime like murder, armed robbery, or drug offenses, and the State is offering a co-defendant a plea deal in exchange for their testimony against you, they are obligated to disclose that deal. You need an experienced attorney to demand that disclosure and to work diligently to prove that witness unreliable. The lawyers at the Law Office of W. Scott Smith are dedicated to their clients and insist on holding the State accountable to the rules. If you find yourself charged with a serious crime and in need of a lawyer to fight for you, call our office at 404-581-0999 for a free consultation.

 

Following Too Closely – Traffic Lawyer

Fender benders happen all over Georgia every day. If you were involved in a car accident where your vehicle struck a vehicle in front of you, the police officer likely issued you a citation for Following too Closely, and gave you a court date to attend.

Georgia law states that drivers shall not follow another vehicle “more closely than is reasonable and prudent.” This means that causing a fender bender accident, or hitting the vehicle in front of you, is a violation of the Following too Closely law. On the other hand, an officer can issue a citation for Following too Closely even if there was no car accident. This occurs where a police officer observes you travelling too closely “than is reasonable and prudent” to the vehicle in front of you. Even with no accident, following another vehicle too closely is a sufficient legal basis for an officer to stop and investigate you and the vehicle.

Do I have to go to Court for a Following too Closely ticket?

In most courts in Georgia, a court appearance is required. In some cases, an attorney can appear on behalf of someone charged under this law.

What happens if I am charged or convicted with Following too Closely?

Following too Closely is a misdemeanor in Georgia. This means the maximum penalty is 12 months in jail and/or $1,000 fine plus court costs and fees. Additionally, if you plead guilty to Following too Closely, it will be reported to your Motor Vehicle Report and three (3) points will be assessed, and insurance can be notified. If a driver gets 15 points in a 2 year period, your Georgia driver’s license will be suspended. A Following too Closely citation can raise insurance rates.

What are the defenses in a Following too Closely case?

It is a jury question whether or not you followed the other vehicle “more closely than is reasonable and prudent.” An experienced lawyer can use this statute in negotiations with the prosecutors. Plea negotiations can occur where the Following too Closely charge gets reduced to a different violation that does not carry points, or get reported to your insurance. A jury trial, or a bench trial in front of the Judge, are options in a Following too Closely case in Georgia.

If you have been cited for Following too Closely and issued a citation, call us today for a FREE CONSULTATION at 404-581-0999.

Why is my child charged as an adult?

There are two reasons why a minor might be charged as an adult. The first is they’re 17. Even though you’re not considered an adult until your 18th birthday for most things – i.e. voting, buying tobacco or a weapon – in the Georgia criminal justice system you are an adult at your 17th birthday.

The other reason is the crime the child is charged with. Under OCGA § 15-11-560 a child that is at least 13 will be charged as an adult in Superior Court if they are alleged to have committed certain crimes. These crimes include murder, rape, aggravated sodomy, aggravated child molestation, aggravated sexual battery, armed robbery with a firearm, and aggravated assault or battery against a police officer. However, there are circumstances that allow these types of cases to be sent back to Juvenile Court.

Every case is different and if your child has been charged as an adult it is imperative to seek out an experienced attorney. Give us a call for a free case consultation.

Corporal Punishment in Georgia: Can I Spank My Child?

There is no statute in Georgia that makes it illegal to spank your child. In fact, O.C.G.A. § 16-5-23(f) states that “corporal punishment administered by a parent or guardian to a child” and “reasonable discipline administered by a parent to a child in the form of corporal punishment, restraint, or detention” are exceptions to the simple battery and family violence statutes.  However, if the punishment is not justified, an individual could face criminal charges for cruelty to children, family violence battery, or even family violence aggravated assault.

In a 2021 Georgia Court of Appeals decision, Espinosa-Herrera v. State (361 Ga.App 99), the court found that a mother’s punishment of her child was not justified corporal punishment because the force that she used was not reasonable. In this case, a mother hit and kicked her son after he had missed the bus and did not fold the blanket on his bed. The Court of Appeals cited another decision (Tabb v. State, 313 Ga.App. 852 (2012)) saying that “although a parent may apply some force to a child as a disciplinary measure without violating the law, the application of such force must be reasonable”.

So, how do we determine what force is reasonable in punishing a child?  A 1989 Georgia Court of Appeals case (LaPann v. State, 191 Ga. App. 499) tells us that “whether the force as applied was an act of reasonable exercise of discipline is a question particularly within the province of the trier of fact”. This means that a jury gets to decide if the punishment used was reasonable, thus meaning that no crime was committed.

Because a jury ultimately decides what is reasonable when it comes to how a parent punishes a child, it is important to have an experienced attorney by your side to tell your story to the jury. The lawyers at W. Scott Smith are trained in pinpointing justification defenses and working with our clients to use the truth to prove our clients innocent. If you have used corporal punishment on your child and find yourself charged with a crime, call our office at 404-581-0999 today for a free consultation.

Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity in Georgia

Georgia law provides certain protections for people who are mentally ill and charged with crimes. O.C.G.A. § 16-3-2 says that a person charged with a crime can be found not guilty by reason of insanity if, at the time of the crime, the person did not have the mental capacity to distinguish between right and wrong. Georgia case law clarifies that this does not mean that any mental illness or psychosis will allow a person to be found not guilty by reason of insanity, but only if the defendant is suffering from a delusion that overpowered their will to resist committing the crime. Additionally, the act the defendant committed must have been justified under Georgia law if the delusion the defendant was suffering from was true.

What does this mean?  Let’s say that a person was suffering from a delusion that their neighbor was trying to kill them. If the neighbor really were trying to kill them, the person would be justified under Georgia law in defending themselves. So, if the person who believed the neighbor was trying to kill them attacked the neighbor, they could be found not guilty by reason of insanity.

This is a distinct issue from whether an individual is competent to stand trial. In order to be found competent to stand trial a person must understand the proceedings going on against him and be capable of helping their attorney prepare their defense. In short, a person could be found competent to stand trial but still found not guilty by reason of insanity.

If you or a loved one are charged with a serious crime like murder or aggravated assault and believe you were suffering from a delusional compulsion at the time of the crime, it is crucial that you hire an experienced attorney to protect you. Not guilty by reason of insanity defenses are tricky but the lawyers at W. Scott Smith are dedicated to helping our clients navigate the justice system so that they can get the help they need. If you are charged in Fulton, Gwinnett, Rockdale, Henry, Dekalb, Clayton, Cobb, or Newton County and have questions about pleading not guilty by reason of insanity, call our office today at 404-581-0999 for a free consultation.

A Recent Georgia Supreme Court Decision on Withdrawing Guilty Pleas

A Georgia Supreme Court case that was recently decided sheds light on what circumstances would allow a guilty plea to be withdrawn and highlights the importance of hiring an experienced criminal defense lawyer early in the process of defending yourself against serious criminal charges.

In Moody v. State, decided on May 16, 2023, the Georgia Supreme Court explains when and why a defendant may choose to withdraw their guilty plea. In Moody, Jeremy Moody was charged with the rape and murder of a 13-year-old girl and the murder of her friend in Fulton County. The crimes occurred on April 5, 2007, Moody was indicted on April 20, 2007, and the State filed written notice that they were seeking the death penalty on May 1, 2007. Moody’s trial began on April 10, 2013, but Moody pleaded guilty to all charges shortly after trial began. The sentencing phase of Moody’s trial began on April 15 and, before a sentence was pronounced, Moody announced that he wished to withdraw his guilty plea.

In normal cases, according to O.C.G.A. § 17-7-93 (b), a defendant may withdraw their guilty plea at any time up until their sentence is pronounced. But, in cases where the State is seeking the death penalty, a defendant may only withdraw their guilty plea “to prevent a manifest injustice.” Browner v. State, 257 Ga. 321 (1987). In this case, Moody argues that his plea was not knowingly and voluntarily entered and that this creates a manifest injustice. The Court found that Moody was 35 years old, had completed his G.E.D., and was not under the influence at the time of his plea. Moody also told the judge that he understood what the plea meant and that he had sufficient time to discuss the plea with his lawyer. The Court found that Moody was not coerced into pleading guilty and that he was not doing so for any reason other than because it was what he wanted to do.

This case highlights why it is important to be represented by an experienced criminal defense lawyer. Although you may withdraw a guilty plea at any time before the sentence is pronounced in cases in which the State is not seeking the death penalty, it is very difficult to withdraw a plea after you have been sentenced by the court. The lawyers at W. Scott Smith are experienced in pre-trial negotiations and will work alongside you to determine if a plea bargain is in your best interest. If you desire a trial, the lawyers at W. Scott Smith will guarantee that you get your day in court. Call our office at 404-581-0999 today for a free consultation.

Using the Alibi Defense in Georgia

An alibi is a defense to criminal charges in Georgia where the defendant says that they weren’t at the scene when the crime occurred.

According to Georgia law, as codified in O.C.G.A. § 16-3-40, an alibi defense involves the impossibility that the person accused of a crime was at the scene of the offense when it was committed. The evidence presented must reasonably exclude the possibility that the defendant was present. IN other words, an alibi is evidence that the defendant was somewhere else when the crime was committed. The defendant doesn’t only have to show that he was somewhere else when the crime was committed but that it was reasonably impossible that he was at the scene of the crime.

For example, if you are charged with murder in Dekalb County, but you are on surveillance video over an hour away in Cherokee County at the time of the murder, you have a valid alibi defense. Additional evidence, such as receipts from establishments in Cherokee County, or people to testify that you were with them in Cherokee County at the time of the murder will strengthen your alibi defense and create the reasonable impossibility that you were at the scene of the murder as required by Georgia law. It is important to hire an experienced attorney right away to help you gather and preserve the evidence you need for this defense.

In Georgia, defendants are required to provide prosecutors notice of their intention to present an alibi defense. However, this notice has several restrictions, as spelled out in O.C.G.A. § 17-16-5. First, the prosecutor must ask for the notice within 10 days of arraignment (or at such time as the court permits). Then, the defendant must provide written notice to the prosecutor within 10 days of the prosecutor’s demand or 10 days before trial, whichever is later. Along with the notice, the defendant must also provide the specific place where they claim to have been during the commission of the crime, and the identity of the witnesses the defendant will present to establish the alibi. In return, the prosecutor must provide the identity of witnesses they will use to rebut the alibi within 5 days of the defendant’s notice or 5 days before trial.

As you can see, the rules surrounding an alibi defense are complex. It is extremely important to have an experienced attorney by your side to help navigate the rules and preserve your right to present an alibi defense. The attorneys at W. Scott Smith possess a wealth of experience defending serious crimes like rape, murder, armed robbery, and aggravated assault, all of which may be defeated with an alibi defense. If you have been charged with one of these serious crimes in Gwinnett, Cobb, Fulton, Dekalb, Clayton, or Henry County, call our office at 404-581-0999 for a free consultation.

Bestiality and Necrophilia

Bestiality is a serious crime in the State of Georgia.

O.C.G.A. § 16-6-6:  A person commits the offense of bestiality when he performs or submits to any sexual act with an animal involving the sex organs of the one and the mouth, anus, penis or vagina of the other.

A person convicted of bestiality shall be punished by imprisonment not less than 1 nor more than 5 years.

Necrophilia is a serious crime in Georgia.

O.C.G.A. § 16-6-7: A person commits the offense of necrophilia when he performs any sexual act with a dead human body involving the sex organs of the one and the mouth, anus, penis or vagina of the other.

A person convicted of necrophilia is punishable by imprisonment for not less than 1 nor more than 10 years.

I would be happy to meet with you any time for a free consultation to discuss your case, your rights and your defenses to these allegations.

Call me at 404-581-0999 and let’s schedule a time to meet and discuss your case.

It is your life, your criminal record and you deserve the best representation possible.

Polygraph Evidence in Georgia

Polygraph tests can be a powerful tool in criminal defense. The tests are widely accessible, portable, relatively inexpensive, painless, and simple to administer. However, it is important to understand how polygraphs can be used in court before deciding if a polygraph would be helpful to your case.

In Georgia, polygraph results are only admissible if both parties agree before the test is administered that the results can be used in court regardless of what they results show. This rule comes from the Georgia Supreme Court case State v. Chambers, which was decided in 1977.   That means that your attorney and the prosecutor will have to agree to who administers the test, what questions are on the test, when and where the test is given, and that the results will be admissible during your trial before you take the test. If there is no agreement, the test results cannot be used.

However, the State cannot use your refusal to consent to a polygraph test against you. In Brown v. State, a 1985 Georgia Court of Appeals case, the court reiterated that only the results are admissible, not the fact that a defendant refused to take a polygraph. It is also important to note that a defendant does not have to be represented by counsel at the time they agree to have the results of a polygraph test admitted in court.

Finally, the admission of polygraph evidence is governed by the Georgia Rules of Evidence in that the test must be administered in a reliable manner and the person testifying about the results (the polygraph examiner) must be qualified as an expert.

If you are charged with a serious crime, it is important to speak with an experienced criminal defense lawyer before agreeing to take a polygraph test because once you agree, the results will be admitted in your trial regardless of what the results say. The lawyers at W. Scott Smith are experienced in representing clients charged with murder, rape, child molestation, drug offenses, gang crimes and aggravated assault, and know how to leverage polygraph evidence to benefit our clients. If you are facing criminal charges in Gwinnett, Fulton, Cobb, Douglas, Forsyth, Dekalb, Clayton, or Fayette County, call our office at 404-581-0999 today for a free consultation.

Sexual Battery

A person commits the offense of sexual battery when he intentionally makes physical contact with the intimate parts of the body of another person without the consent of that person.

How does the law define intimate parts? It is defined as the primary genital area, anus, groin, inner thighs, or buttocks of a male or female and the breasts of a female.

The intent to do the act is a question of fact for the jury to decide.

Whether there is a conflict in the evidence of whether the victim voluntarily submitted to the contact, it is for a jury to decide that conflict in testimony.

Sexual battery does not require any sexual contact. It only requires the non-consensual, intentional physical contact with the victims’ intimate body parts.

Prior to 2021, an individual younger than 16 years old was legally incapable of consenting to sexual contact. In the case of Watson v. State, the Supreme Court construed the statute to require actual proof of the victim’s lack of consent, regardless of the victim’s age.

Sexual battery is punished as a misdemeanor of a high and aggravated nature. However, if the victim is under 16 years of age, it is punishable as a felony.

The rule of lenity does not apply between sexual battery and child molestation because child molestation requires additional proof of the defendant seeking to arouse his own sexual desires, which is not required for sexual battery. Furthermore, sexual battery requires proof of physical contact and the victims lack of consent, which are not required for the offense of child molestation.