Posts

Trafficking Marijuana through the Atlanta Airport

When a person traveling to Atlanta is charged with trafficking marijuana at the Atlanta airport the first concern is going to be how to get a bond to get the person charged with trafficking marijuana at the Atlanta airport out of jail as soon as possible.  Another question is, how much will my bond be for trafficking marijuana?  At our law firm we have handled a number of bond hearings and received consent bonds in Clayton County on trafficking marijuana at the Atlanta airport.  We believe we have a recipe for success that you can follow in order to get a bond on a trafficking marijuana case.  A bond hearing is where a judge will decide if the person trafficking in marijuana at the Atlanta airport is a good candidate for bond.  The factors a judge will consider on trafficking cases generally include, criminal record or lack of a criminal record, flight risk or whether the person will appear in court when directed, and/or likelihood of committing a new felony offense while out on bond.  Since people who are charged with trafficking in marijuana are generally transient or they generally have out of Georgia ties, the court will be concerned they will not appear in court when the case comes up for additional court dates.  You must be in a position to allay the court’s fears the person charged with trafficking marijuana will in fact appear in court when directed to do so.  A consent bond is where the State’s prosecutor agrees to a bond amount and the defense accepts because the person arrested for trafficking marijuana at the Atlanta airport feels they can afford the bond amount.

First question for consideration is how much did the Marijuana in the person traveling with marijuana in their suitcase at the Atlanta airport weigh.  If it is less that twenty pounds your chances of getting a lower bond in Clayton County are greater.  Second, did the person traveling have more that $1000 cash on them.  If they did, they are likely a mule.  A mule is someone who is generally destitute or poor and they are so desperate for money that they agree to transport a suitcase or luggage without knowing its contents.  If the person is poor and you can show the prosecutor this evidence and they had a large sum of money (which is consistent with the mule’s fee) the prosecutor is more likely to grant a bond.  Third, do the flight records show a first-time travel for that person on the same flight origination?  If so, this is likely the first time the person traveling with the large amounts of marijuana is flying with marijuana.  If you can show no pattern of travel the State is more likely to consent to a low bond.  The State’s prosecutor and Court will want to know the criminal history of client.  Things of major importance will be does the person have any felonies on their record?  Has the person ever failed to appear in court – even for traffic violations?  Does the person have any violations of probation or parole?  Furthermore, it is important to have a local address in which the person charged with trafficking marijuana will live at while the case is pending.

If you are an attorney trying to acquire a consent bond for trafficking marijuana in Clayton County at the Atlanta Jackson-Hartsfield Airport, here is what you need to do.  Go through the criminal history to have a good handle on what the criminal history provides.  If any discrepancies come up on the persons charged GCIC or NCIC be in a position to pull the official court record to confirm the inaccuracies in the official record.  In our experience this happens way too often.  Second, pull a copy of the incident report.  You will need to make a copy of the incident report and provide a copy to the State’s prosecutor in order to get a quick bond offer.  If client has a passport, obtain the passport and be willing to turn the passport in to law enforcement to hold pending the case’s outcome.  If client is poor, have client provide you access to his or her bank account to show how little amount she has in the account.  If client lives in an apartment or humble residence, have someone take photos of the residence to show the State’s prosecutor client’s simple living arrangements.  If client does not have a local address to live at see if client’s family can acquire a local address.  Lastly, do not have client snitch or become a state witness.  In my experience it serves no purpose as it does not assist in getting a bond.

Making A Murderer: Pointing the Finger in Georgia

MAKING A MURDERER: Pointing the Finger in Georgia

The Netflix documentary Making a Murderer brought to light several issues with our justice system. Two of the most important issues a defense attorney has to overcome is the “presumption of guilt” presented by the media, and the loss of exculpatory evidence caused by poor police investigations.

“Presumption of Guilt”

“All due respect to counsel, the state is supposed to start every criminal trial swimming upstream. And the strong current against which the state is swimming is the presumption of innocence.” – Dean Strang, co-defense counsel for Steven Avery.

Many times, the media will broadcast inflammatory stories regarding pending investigations. Regardless of the truth of the stories, they tend to irreparably tamper with the minds of the prospective jurors months or even years before the trial begins.

The law requires jurors to give the defendant the presumption of innocence, but many jurors are already biased against the defendant because he has been charged with a crime and is seated at the defense table. High-profile cases present an additional hurdle because the jurors have already heard many untrue facts about the case from the media.

We rarely encourage clients to make statements to police or media since those statements can be used against them at trial. In fact, the best way to truly prove one’s innocence to the public is to have a jury find you NOT GUILTY. However, every case is unique, and we use our experience with high-profile cases to develop a plan to counteract this media bias. Recently, our firm counseled Marcus Lewis, the Uber driver who was wrongly accused, and advised him to speak with the police with our support. He was exonerated in less than 24 hours, and no charges were ever filed from the police. Learn more about that case here: http://www.11alive.com/story/news/crime/2015/12/29/uber-driver-defends-reputation-after-social-media-allegations/78031302/

It Was the Other Guy

In Making a Murderer, Steven Avery’s attorneys were unable to accuse any specific person of committing the murder. Instead, they had to focus on the poor investigation conducted by the police in general. The Judge limited Steven’s defense due to Wisconsin law. There, a defendant cannot point their finger and allege that a third party committed the crime unless he can present evidence of the third party’s motif, opportunity, and a direct connection between the third person and the crime charged.

In Georgia, the standard is much lower than that in Wisconsin. The defense here only has to present evidence that “renders the desired inference that [the other guy] committed the crimes . . . more probable than would be that inference without the evidence.” Henderson v. State, 255 Ga. 687, 689 (Ga. 1986). All the defense needs is enough evidence “to raise a reasonable doubt of defendant’s guilt in the mind of a juror.” Essentially, the defense needs to present the jury with an alternative that makes a single juror question whether it is possible the defendant did not commit the crime, and that someone else did.

Even though Georgia has a lower standard than Wisconsin, it can still be tough to gather evidence that someone else committed the crime when the police have conducted a careless investigation. In these situations, it is imperative that we get involved as early as possible to ensure that we are able to do our own investigation and gather our own evidence before it is too late. If you have been charged with a crime, please contact our office today at 404-581-0999 for a FREE CONSULTATION in our office so that we can begin working on your case immediately.

They found my gun at the airport! What happens now?

Bringing Your Gun to the Hartsfield-Jackson Airport in Atlanta, GA

In addition to being the nation’s busiest airport, Atlanta’s Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport is also known for confiscating more firearms during security screening than any other airport in the country.

Historically, at Hartsfield-Jackson, when a TSA officer would find a traveler’s firearm during security screening, they would detain the traveler, confiscate the firearm, and immediately notify local law enforcement.  This would happen regardless of whether the traveler had a permit to carry the firearm because Georgia law strictly prohibited the possession of all firearms in its airports.

So, before July 1, 2014, the traveler would be arrested by the Clayton County Police Department and taken to jail. Travel plans would obviously be ruined and a criminal charges would be brought against the traveler. Then, if the prosecuting authority determined that the traveler had no criminal history and there were no aggravating circumstances surrounding the firearm confiscation, they would invite the traveler to participate in their pre-trial diversion program. By successfully completing the program, which involves community service, a gun safety class, and often, drug testing, the traveler would avoid a conviction on their criminal history.

While Clayton County would go forward with their criminal case, TSA would be assessing a federal civil penalty for the firearm violation. Upon determining the fine amount, the traveler would receive a letter via U.S. mail notifying them as to the amount they owe TSA. The penalty would range anywhere from $500 to $10,000 and depend on a variety of circumstances including the traveler’s intentions, level of cooperation, prior history,  risk to the community, and negotiation skills.

That was before July 1…

Now, as of July 1, 2014, Georgia residents with licenses to carry firearms are permitted to carry their firearm in many public places, including the entrance and waiting area in the Hartsfield-Jackson airport. Obviously, this permission does NOT extend to the airport’s terminals due to federal law but TSA officers at security screening will no longer call Clayton County Police Department if the traveler can show proof of their permit to carry.

Instead of calling the police, TSA will give the traveler the following options: 1) check the firearm as luggage (if properly secured in a hard case), 2) return the firearm to their vehicle (if they parked it at the airport), 3) hand the firearm to an individual who is licensed to carry in Georgia and not traveling via the airport, or, in the event that no other option works out, 4) forfeit the firearm permanently to TSA.

Whether the traveler has a license to carry a firearm or not, TSA will still pursue a civil case against them. Like before, TSA will investigate the circumstances of the case and assess a civil penalty ranging from $500 to $10,000. TSA may also temporarily suspend a traveler’s “TSA Pre-Check.”

It is important to remember that Georgia’s new gun laws only affect Georgia residents with valid licenses to carry their firearm(s). All other travelers carrying guns in the Hartsfield-Jackson airport remain out of luck when it comes to TSA calling Clayton County Police Department. Those individuals will be arrested and charged like all gun-carrying travelers were charged prior to July 1, 2014.

If you were charged with bringing a firearm to the Hartsfield-Jackson airport or have any questions about the subject, do not hesitate to contact our firm for a free consultation. You can trust that our firm will work hard to protect your rights and secure the best possible outcome.

VIDEO: Charged with Carrying a Firearm into Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EO70ooDXuEw&feature=youtu.be

Forgot you left your Glock 19 in your carryon bag?

This happens more often than you would imagine.

In 2012, Hartsfield-Jackson Airport in Atlanta had more guns seized at TSA checkpoints than any airport in the U.S. with 96.  Don’t leave your gun in your carry-on bag, because what results is being charged with Carrying a Weapon in an Unauthorized Area.  Your weapon will be seized and you will be arrested.

Once arrested, you will be fingerprinted and need to make bond.  If arrested at Hartsfield-Jackson Airport for Carrying a Weapon in an Unauthorized Area, your court case will be assigned to the Clayton County State Court Solicitor General’s Office for prosecution.  Bond will likely be $3,500.00.

Our firm has handled a number of these cases and every case to-date has been dismissed.  There are several proactive steps we can take in order to make sure the case gets dismissed; including a gun safety course and community service.  It should be noted there is also an administrative component to these cases where the Department of Homeland Security/TSA will move to fine you through the administrative courts.  If you find yourself having been charged and want to protect your record, CALL US immediately 24 hours a day, 7 days a week at 404-581-0999.