YOUR RIGHTS AGAINST ILLEGAL SEARCH AND SEIZURES

Interacting with police officers can be a stressful and unsettling experience, especially when you’re unsure of your rights. Many individuals, both in Fulton County and across the country, often feel confused when questioned by police officers or when the police attempt to search their property or belongings.

Citizens are protected by the Fourth Amendment against unlawful searches and seizures. This blog explains your rights if stopped by police in your vehicle or if an officer attempts to search your body, car, or home without a warrant.

Your Freedom to Refuse a Search Without a Warrant

When a police officer attempts to search you or your property, the first question you should ask is: “Do you have a warrant?” In most cases, police officers are required to have a valid search warrant to conduct a search of your person or property. Without this, any search or seizure could be deemed unlawful, and any items found could potentially be suppressed in court through a motion to suppress filed by the defense.

When Can Police Search You Without a Warrant?

Here are a few circumstances when police officers can conduct a search without a warrant:

Search Incident to Arrest

The most common scenario where a search can occur without a warrant is when a person is arrested. This is known as a search incident to arrest. When an individual is arrested, the officer is allowed to search the person to remove any weapons or contraband that may be used to resist arrest or escape. This applies even if a significant amount of time has passed since the arrest or processing, as highlighted in in Barrera-Palamin v. State, 250 Ga. App. 580 (2001).

However, a search cannot happen before an arrest and be used as justification for the arrest itself, as seen in Smith v. Ohio, 494 U.S. 541 (1990).

Vehicle Searches

Under both the Georgia Constitution and the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, police may search a vehicle without a warrant if the driver has been arrested. This is based on the idea that law enforcement has a legitimate need to secure any weapons or evidence that may be in the vehicle. However, if the officer only issues a citation without making an arrest, they cannot search the vehicle. This is made clear in Knowles v. Iowa, 525 U.S. 113 (1998).

Abandonment of Property

If you relinquish control or ownership of an item, such as a vehicle, police can search it because you no longer have an expectation of privacy. In Gresham v. State, 204 Ga. App. 540  (1992), it was ruled that if you abandon your property, you lose the right to object to a search.

Denial of Ownership

If you deny ownership of an item, such as when you refuse responsibility for an item in your possession, you lose the expectation of privacy over it. Police may search the item without violating your rights. This was affirmed in Deych v. State, 188 Ga. App. 901 (1988).

Plain View

If police are lawfully present in an area and see evidence of a crime in plain view, they can seize it without a warrant.

Exigent Circumstances

In urgent situations, such as when there’s a risk of evidence being destroyed or a suspect fleeing, police can conduct a search without a warrant.

Stop and Frisk

If a police officer has reasonable suspicion that a person is armed and dangerous, they can stop and frisk the individual for weapons.

Border and Airport Searches

Searches that take place at the airport or at the borders may not require a warrant

Consent

If you give an officer permission to search your property, they will. They do not need a warrant after you give them permission to search your property.

Special Considerations for Cell Phones

If you are arrested and have a cell phone in your possession, it’s important to know that police cannot search the contents of your phone without a warrant. The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Riley v. California, 573 U.S. 373 (2014) ruled that police must obtain a warrant before accessing the contents of a cell phone, as it contains personal and private information.

Consequences of a Conviction

It is important to understand the potential consequences of being convicted of a crime. Your rights during a police stop or search are crucial to ensuring that your case is handled fairly. If you believe your rights have been violated during a police interaction, it’s important to seek legal advice immediately and contact us.

Remember, if you ever feel unsure about your rights or how to handle a situation with law enforcement, don’t hesitate to reach out for assistance. We are here to help you navigate these challenging moments 24/7.

Georgia Conspiracy

In Georgia, a conspiracy charge basically means that two or more people agreed to commit a crime, and at least one of them did something to move that plan forward—even just a small step.

So, imagine you and a friend are talking about robbing a store. If you both agree to do it, and then one of you buys masks or scopes out the place, that could be enough for the state to charge you with criminal conspiracy—even if the robbery never actually happens.

The key elements are: 1) An agreement between two or more people to commit a crime, and 2) an “overt act”—which is just some action taken to help carry out the plan.

It doesn’t have to be a huge or illegal step. Something as simple as making a phone call to set up the plan, or buying supplies, can count as that overt act.

In Georgia, conspiracy is usually charged based on the severity of the crime the group was planning. If you were conspiring to commit a felony, the conspiracy charge will likely be written as “conspiracy to commit a felony” and therefore you will be charged with that felony.

There are several defenses to a conspiracy charge. The first one is that there was never a real agreement made. You can discuss a crime and not agree to it—that would not typically rise to the level of conspiracy. Another defense is showing that no overt act was committed. So even if you and someone else agree to commit a crime, there has to be some kind of action taken toward the crime. If no one did anything to move the plan forward, then the conspiracy charge faulters. You can also withdraw from the conspiracy before any crime is actually committed, but you have to show that you took clear steps to back out. Finally, the prosecution needs to show that there was actual intent involved in committing the crime. Without intent, the conspiracy charge likely does hold.

If you’ve been charged with a conspiracy, call our office today and talk to one of our experienced and dedicated trial attorneys.

Pretrial Intervention Program in the State Court of Henry County

What is the PTI Program?

Pretrial Intervention (PTI)  Program helps some people avoid going to trial. If you qualify and complete certain steps—like paying small fees, doing community service, and following the program’s rules—you won’t be convicted of a crime. Plus, you may be able to have your arrest record hidden from public view.

Who is Eligible?

People who are usually eligible for the program are first-time offenders or those charged with minor, non-violent crimes who have little or no criminal record

Ineligible Offenses

The program is not available to people charged with:

  • DUI or other drug/alcohol-related charges that require minimum jail time
  • Violent crimes or crimes involving guns or strangulation
  • Any crime that has a required minimum prison sentence by law

Conclusion

The PTI program in Henry County State Court offers a valuable opportunity for people facing certain misdemeanor charges to avoid a lasting conviction. If you’re a non-violent, first-time offender, it’s a good idea to speak with an attorney early—acting quickly can improve your chances of getting into the program and completing it successfully. For a free consultation, contact the attorneys at W. Scott Smith, P.C. today at 404-581-0999. We’re here to help guide you through your legal options.

Your Right to Record the Police in Georgia: What the First Amendment Really Protects

In an era of increasing public scrutiny over police behavior, the act of recording law enforcement officers has become not only common but essential. In Georgia, as in much of the United States, your right to record government officials—including police officers—while they are performing their duties in public is protected by the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Whether you are an uninvolved bystander or the subject of a police encounter, understanding your rights is crucial to protecting both yourself and the transparency of government actions.

The First Amendment guarantees the right to free speech, a free press, and the right to petition the government for redress of grievances. Courts, including the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals (which governs Georgia), have interpreted these protections to include the right of individuals to record public officials in public places. The Eleventh Circuit has expressly recognized a citizen’s right to record police officers performing their official duties in public, stating that such recording promotes accountability and is consistent with the core purposes of the First Amendment.

In Georgia, this means that if you witness a police-citizen encounter in a public space—like a sidewalk, park, or street—you have the constitutional right to film the interaction, as long as you are not physically interfering with law enforcement duties. Police may not confiscate your recording device, delete your footage, or otherwise retaliate against you simply for documenting their actions. This is true even if they find the recording inconvenient or unwelcome.

The right to record also applies when you are the individual involved in the police encounter. For example, if you are pulled over during a traffic stop or questioned on the street, you are allowed to use your phone or another device to record the interaction. This recording can serve as valuable evidence in the event of misconduct, confusion, or dispute over what was said or done.

However, the right to record is not without limits. Courts have held that while you have a constitutional right to document police, that right is subject to reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions. This means you cannot interfere with an officer’s ability to do their job. For instance, standing too close, refusing to follow lawful orders, or inserting yourself into an active investigation may result in obstruction charges, even if your intent is only to record.

If you are told by a law enforcement officer to stop recording, the appropriate response depends on the circumstances. If your recording is being done from a safe distance and without disruption, you are not legally required to comply with such an order. However, refusing to follow a direct police command—even an unlawful one—can escalate the situation, so it’s often safest to continue recording while clearly stating that you are exercising your constitutional rights and are not interfering. Remain calm and respectful; assert your rights without escalating tension. If the officer insists or threatens arrest, it’s generally best to comply in the moment and seek legal redress later.

Importantly, Georgia is a one-party consent state when it comes to audio recording under O.C.G.A. § 16-11-62. This means that as long as one party to the conversation (which can be you) consents to the recording, it is legal to record audio—even if the other party is unaware. This applies to recording your own interaction with police but does not extend to secretly recording conversations where you are not present or a party to the discussion.

There are some boundaries to be mindful of. Georgia law prohibits surreptitious recording inside private places where there is an expectation of privacy, such as homes or restrooms. But public spaces—including sidewalks, parks, or areas where the public has access—are fair game for recording, even when law enforcement officers are involved.

The Atlanta Police Department, like several other Georgia jurisdictions, has internal policies that affirm the public’s right to record officers, provided it does not interfere with official duties. These policies are increasingly being adopted across the state, acknowledging that citizen recordings have become vital tools in ensuring police accountability.

Recording officers serves a vital democratic function. It helps preserve an accurate record of public interactions, can deter misconduct, and supports the integrity of the legal process. Knowing your rights—and exercising them responsibly—contributes to a more transparent and just society. If you were arrested for recording law enforcement in a public space, contact a criminal defense attorney who can help you assess the legality of your actions and defend your constitutional rights.

In Georgia, your phone can be a powerful tool for justice. The law protects your right to use it—wisely and lawfully.

 

Understanding Criminal Damage to Property in the First Degree in Georgia

If you or a loved one has been charged with Criminal Damage to Property in the First Degree under Georgia law (OCGA § 16-7-22), it’s critical to understand the seriousness of this offense and what’s at stake. This charge is a felony and can lead to significant prison time—ranging from 1 to 20 years, depending on the circumstances.

This blog breaks down what this law means, how it’s commonly violated, what the prosecution must prove, and how it differs from second and third-degree charges.

 

What Is Criminal Damage to Property in the First Degree?

Under OCGA § 16-7-22, this felony occurs when someone knowingly and without permission causes certain types of dangerous or destructive interference with property.

Common Examples of First-Degree Criminal Damage

Situation Explanation
Endangering Human Life Example: firing a gun at or near a building. No one needs to be hurt—just acting recklessly in a way that could endanger lives.
Disrupting Vital Public Services or Infrastructure Interfering with utilities, internet, transportation, etc., either physically or electronically (e.g., hacking, malware).
Shooting at a Building from a Vehicle Discharging a firearm into a structure while in a car or immediately after exiting the vehicle.

 

What Must Prosecutors Prove?

To convict you, the State must prove the following beyond a reasonable doubt:

  1. Knowledge + No Permission
    You knew what you were doing and acted without lawful authority.
  2. One of These Acts Occurred
    • Act recklessly in a way that endangered human life
    • Interfere with critical infrastructure or services (even electronically)
    • Fire a gun into a building from a vehicle

 

Penalties for First-Degree Criminal Damage

Type of Offense Prison Time
Reckless endangerment or gunfire 1–10 years
Interference with critical systems (any method) 2–20 years

This is a felony, and a conviction can impact your employment, housing, gun rights, and future opportunities.

 

Comparison: 1st vs. 2nd vs. 3rd Degree

Degree What It Involves Key Element Felony? Sentence
1st Endangering life, critical system interference, or shooting Danger or system impact ✅ Yes 1–10 yrs (or 2–20 yrs)
2nd Intentional damage over $500 or use of fire/explosives Value or means ✅ Yes 1–5 years
3rd Damage worth $500 or less Value ❌ No Up to 12 months

 

Why You Need Legal Representation

Being charged with Criminal Damage to Property in the First Degree is not something to take lightly. You’re facing a felony record and years of incarceration. These cases can hinge on facts like intent, ownership, and actual risk or damage—which are often disputable with the right defense strategy.

At W. Scott Smith, PC., we understand how to challenge the prosecution’s evidence and protect your rights. If you’ve been arrested or are under investigation, the time to act is now.

 

Understanding Bond Revocation Hearings in Georgia

When someone is arrested and charged with a crime, they are often granted bond, allowing them to be released from jail while awaiting their trial. Bond is typically granted to ensure that the individual returns to court for future hearings. However, bond is not an automatic guarantee, and it can be revoked under certain circumstances.

In Georgia, bond revocation hearings are serious proceedings with significant consequences. If the court revokes a defendant’s bond, they may be required to remain in jail until their trial, which could drastically affect their case and personal life. To navigate these hearings successfully, it’s critical to have an experienced criminal defense attorney by your side.

What is a Bond Revocation Hearing?

A bond revocation hearing in Georgia is a legal proceeding in which the prosecution requests that the court revoke a defendant’s bond due to alleged violations of bond conditions. These violations can include failing to appear in court, committing new crimes, or failing to comply with specific requirements outlined in the bond agreement.

Georgia law allows a judge to revoke bond under a few conditions, such as:

  • Failure to appear for court hearings: If a defendant misses a scheduled court date, the judge may decide to revoke their bond.
  • New criminal charges: If the defendant is arrested on new charges while out on bond, the court may decide to revoke the bond.
  • Violation of other bond conditions: Some conditions of bond may include restrictions like curfews, electronic monitoring, or maintaining employment. Violating any of these could lead to bond revocation.

During a bond revocation hearing, the judge will assess whether the defendant’s actions pose a risk to public safety, whether they are likely to flee the jurisdiction, and whether they have violated the conditions of their release. It’s important to note that bond revocation hearings usually go pretty quickly and don’t involve as much back-and-forth as a full trial. That’s why it is critical to have an experienced attorney who knows the ins and outs of the process to advocate on your behalf.

The outcome of a bond revocation hearing can have serious consequences, including staying in jail for an extended period of time while awaiting trial.  Call the experience peach state lawyers here at W. Scott Smith, P.C. at 404-581-0999 to help you navigate the legal complexities of bond revocation hearings, craft a strong defense, and help you avoid unnecessary jail time.

Theft Crimes in Clayton County

Theft charges can arise in several different ways, but the two most common are theft by taking and theft by receiving stolen property.

Theft By Taking

Theft by taking occurs when a person is accused of unlawfully taking property that belongs to another person with the intent to deprive that other person of their property. Theft by taking is defined by statute in O.C.G.A. §16-8-2. “Deprive” means to withhold property of another permanently or temporarily or to dispose of the property to make it unlikely that the owner will recover it. The value of the property is only important when it comes to sentencing.

If the value of the property is less than $1,500.00, the case will be charged as a misdemeanor, and a person could be sentenced up to 12 months in custody. If the value of the property is $1,500.01 to $5,000.00, the case will be charged as a felony, and a person could be sentenced up to 5 years in custody. If the value of the property is $5,000.01 to $25,000.00, the case will be charged as a felony, and a person could be sentenced up to 10 years in custody. For property valued over $25,000, the potential sentence is 20 years in custody.

Theft By Receiving Stolen Property

Theft by receiving stolen property occurs when a person receives, disposes of, or retains property that a person knows or should know is stolen. Knowledge is a required element of theft by receiving. This means that the government must prove that the person they are charging knew that the property was stolen.

Just like theft by taking, the value of the property determines the potential sentencing. If the value of the property is less than $1,500.00, the case will be charged as a misdemeanor, and a person could be sentenced up to 12 months in custody. If the value of the property is $1,500.01 to $5,000.00, the case will be charged as a felony, and a person could be sentenced up to 5 years in custody. If the value of the property is $5,000.01 to $25,000.00, the case will be charged as a felony, and a person could be sentenced up to 10 years in custody. For property valued over $25,000, the potential sentence is 20 years in custody.

As you can see, theft charges can carry serious penalties. It is important to hire an experienced attorney if you are facing theft charges in Clayton County. The lawyers at W. Scott Smith, PC can review the evidence in your case and determine the best strategy for defending the case. Call our office at 404-581-0999 today for a free consultation.

What is self-defense in Georgia?

In Georgia, self-defense means you’re legally allowed to use force—even deadly force—if you reasonably believe it’s necessary to protect yourself (or someone else) from imminent harm. That harm could be things like being assaulted, threatened with a weapon, or facing a serious threat to your life or safety.

When can you use force?

Georgia law says you can use force if you’re protecting yourself or someone else, you believe it’s immediately necessary to prevent harm and/or you’re not the aggressor (more on that in a second).

This covers both non-deadly and deadly force. But deadly force is only okay if you’re trying to stop death/serious injury or a forcible felony (like armed robbery, kidnapping, or rape).

Stand Your Ground in Georgia

Georgia has what’s called a Stand Your Ground law. This means you don’t have to retreat before using force—even deadly force. In other words, if you’re somewhere you legally have a right to be (like your home, car, or even a public place), you can stand your ground and defend yourself.

Limits & Exceptions

Self-defense isn’t a free pass to use force whenever you want. It doesn’t apply if you were the one who started the fight (the aggressor), you used force during the commission of a crime or you provoked someone into attacking you and then used that as an excuse to fight back. Basically, you can’t pick a fight and then claim self-defense when things escalate.

What if you’re charged anyway?

Even if you believe you acted in self-defense, you might still get arrested or charged—especially if there’s confusion about who started it, or if witnesses give conflicting stories. But in Georgia, you can raise self-defense as a legal defense, and if the court agrees, you won’t be convicted. Give our office a call today and speak with an experienced attorney at (404)581-0999.

Driving with a Suspended License in Henry County, Georgia: What You Need to Know

If you’re caught driving with a suspended license in Henry County, Georgia, the consequences can be severe. Georgia law treats this offense seriously, and penalties escalate with each subsequent violation.

According to Georgia Code §40-5-121, the penalties for driving with a suspended or revoked license depend on the number or prior convictions within the past five years:

First Offense punishment:

  • No less than 2 days in jail
  • A fine of $500 to $1000
  • You could also be placed on probation

Second or Third Offense punishment:

  • No less than 10 days in jail
  • A fine of $1000 to $2500
  • You could also be placed on probation

Fourth Offense punishment:

  • Considered a felony
  • 1 to 5 years in jail
  • Fines
  • Probation

Driving with a suspended license in Henry County, Georgia, is a serious offense with significant legal consequences. If you’re facing charges, consult the qualified lawyers at W. Scott Smith, P.C. to understand your options. Call us at 404-581-0999 for a free consultation.

Continuing Effects of Convictions

In Georgia, prior convictions can play a significant—and sometimes devastating—role in current or future criminal prosecutions. Many people assume that once they’ve served their sentence, the slate is wiped clean. Unfortunately, that’s not always the case. Georgia law allows prosecutors to use a person’s criminal history in a variety of ways, from influencing bail decisions to enhancing sentences, and even as evidence in trial. Understanding how and when prior convictions can be used is essential for anyone navigating the criminal justice system.
One of the most common and immediate ways prior convictions can impact a new criminal case is during the pretrial phase. Judges may consider a defendant’s criminal history when deciding whether to grant bond, how high to set the bond amount, or whether to impose additional conditions of release. Under O.C.G.A. § 17-6-1, the court is instructed to consider the accused’s criminal record, including prior convictions, when evaluating flight risk and danger to the community. This means that a person with a lengthy criminal history may face higher bail or denial of bond altogether—even before guilt is established.

Past convictions also play a pivotal role in sentencing. Under Georgia’s recidivist statute, O.C.G.A. § 17-10-7, repeat offenders can face significantly harsher penalties than first-time offenders. In fact, for certain felony offenses, if a person has three or more prior felony convictions, the court is required to impose the maximum sentence available, and that sentence must be served without the possibility of parole. This law is often referred to as Georgia’s “three strikes” rule, and it can effectively turn a relatively minor charge into a life-altering punishment.
But the use of prior convictions doesn’t stop at sentencing. In some cases, the prosecution may attempt to introduce a defendant’s past criminal history at trial as evidence of guilt. Under Georgia’s evidence code, specifically O.C.G.A. § 24-4-404(b), the general rule is that evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is not admissible to prove a person’s character in order to show action in conformity therewith. However, there are exceptions. The prosecution may offer such evidence to show motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident. This is commonly referred to as “similar transaction” or “other acts” evidence.

Before introducing prior acts under 404(b), the State must provide notice to the defense and receive approval from the judge, who must determine whether the probative value outweighs any unfair prejudice to the defendant. The Georgia Supreme Court has emphasized that such evidence must be “sufficiently connected” to the case at hand to be admissible. That said, if allowed, it can heavily sway a jury’s opinion and lead to convictions based more on a defendant’s past than the facts of the current charge.

Additionally, past convictions may be used to impeach a defendant’s credibility if they choose to testify. Under O.C.G.A. § 24-6-609, certain prior convictions may be admitted for the purpose of attacking the credibility of a witness, including the defendant. Generally, felony convictions or crimes involving dishonesty or false statements are admissible for this purpose, provided the conviction is not too remote in time—usually within the past ten years. If a defendant takes the stand, their criminal record may be used to cast doubt on their truthfulness, which can be particularly damaging in cases that hinge on credibility.

Despite the serious consequences of having a criminal record, Georgia law does not always allow for prior convictions to be used indiscriminately. Judges are tasked with weighing the relevance and potential for unfair prejudice, especially when evidence of past misconduct threatens to overshadow the current charges. Defense attorneys can and should file motions to exclude such evidence when it risks compromising the fairness of the trial.

In summary, prior convictions can—and often do—resurface in future criminal proceedings in Georgia. From pretrial release decisions and sentencing enhancements to evidentiary use at trial, a person’s past can heavily influence the outcome of their present case. Understanding these laws and preparing for how prior convictions may be used is critical for mounting a strong legal defense. Anyone facing charges in Georgia should consult with an experienced criminal defense attorney, like those at Peach State Lawyers, to protect their rights and mitigate the impact of their criminal history.

For insight on when your criminal record can be restricted, commonly referred to as expunged, read our next post titled, “