Arrested for Marijuana Trafficking at Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport?

If you or a loved one has been arrested for marijuana trafficking at Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport (ATL), you’re likely feeling overwhelmed, anxious, and unsure of what comes next. As a criminal defense attorney with 25 years of experience practicing law in Atlanta, Georgia, I’ve handled countless cases just like this. My firm, Peach State Lawyer, specializes in defending individuals facing drug-related charges at the airport, from small amounts like 10 gummies to larger quantities around 50 pounds or more. We understand the stakes are high, and we’re here to guide you through the process. In this post, I’ll outline what typically happens after an arrest, the legal implications under Georgia law, and why securing experienced legal representation immediately is crucial.

The Immediate Aftermath: Arrest and Booking

Arrests for marijuana trafficking at ATL often occur during routine security screenings, baggage checks, or targeted interdictions by the Atlanta Police Department (APD), U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), or the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA). These agencies patrol the airport aggressively due to its status as one of the busiest in the world, and they use advanced detection methods like K-9 units and X-ray scanners to identify suspected contraband.

Once arrested, you’ll be taken into custody on-site and transported to the Clayton County Jail for booking. This process includes fingerprinting, photographing, and an initial intake where personal belongings are confiscated. Expect to spend at least a few hours—or potentially days—in holding while paperwork is processed. At the jail, you’ll have access to basic necessities, but conditions can be stressful. Inmates can submit a phone list of up to 10 numbers for calls, and visitation is available on weekends and holidays from 9:00 AM to 10:15 AM. Family members can send money via money order (only if they’re on your approved visitor list), but it’s wise to avoid discussing case details over jail phones, as calls may be recorded.

A bond hearing usually occurs within 48 hours of arrest, where a judge determines if you can be released pending trial. Bond amounts vary based on the quantity of marijuana, your criminal history, and flight risk, but for trafficking charges, they can be substantial—often tens of thousands of dollars. If bond is granted, a bondsman can help secure your release for a fee (typically 10-15% of the bond amount).  We can assist you through this process.

Understanding the Charges: Marijuana Trafficking in Georgia

Georgia law treats marijuana trafficking seriously, with charges escalating based on the amount involved. Under Georgia Code § 16-13-31(c), trafficking applies when you possess, sell, manufacture, deliver, or bring into the state more than 10 pounds of marijuana. This is a felony offense, distinct from simple possession (under 1 ounce, which is a misdemeanor) or possession with intent to distribute (1 ounce to 10 pounds, also a felony but with lighter penalties).

Penalties are tiered by weight:

– 10 to 2,000 pounds: Mandatory minimum 5 years in prison and a $100,000 fine.

– 2,000 to 10,000 pounds: Mandatory minimum 7 years in prison and a $250,000 fine.

– Over 10,000 pounds: Mandatory minimum 15 years in prison and a $1,000,000 fine.

Even smaller amounts, like edibles (e.g., 10 gummies), can lead to possession with intent charges if authorities believe they were intended for distribution, carrying 1 to 10 years in prison. Federal involvement is possible if the case crosses state lines or involves international flights, potentially adding federal charges with even harsher penalties. Additionally, a conviction can result in long-term consequences like loss of driver’s license, professional licenses, or immigration status issues.

The Court Process: From Arraignment to Resolution

Your case will be handled in Clayton County Superior Court, which oversees all felony matters in the area. Here’s a step-by-step overview of what to expect:

  1. Arraignment: Within months of arrest, you’ll appear in court to enter a plea (guilty, not guilty, or no contest). This is also when formal charges are read, and bond may be revisited.
  2. Discovery and Pre-Trial Motions: Prosecutors from the Clayton County District Attorney’s Office will share evidence, such as lab reports, witness statements, and airport surveillance. Your attorney can file motions to suppress evidence if it was obtained unlawfully (e.g., improper search).
  3. Plea Negotiations or Trial: Many cases resolve through plea deals, potentially reducing charges or sentences. If no agreement is reached, the case goes to trial, where a jury decides guilt. For eligible non-violent offenders, Clayton County’s Adult Felony Drug Court offers an alternative: a supervised treatment program that could lead to charge dismissal upon completion. Our firm has been extremely successful in avoiding prison on cases involving marijuana trafficking at the airport.

 

The entire process can take months to over a year, depending on court backlog and case complexity. During this time, you may be required to attend hearings, submit to drug testing, or comply with pre-trial release conditions.

Why You Need a Skilled Defense Attorney Right Away

Navigating this system alone is risky—prosecutors are aggressive, and mistakes early on can jeopardize your defense. An experienced lawyer can:

– Challenge the arrest’s validity (e.g., was the search constitutional?).

– Negotiate for reduced charges or alternative sentencing.

– Represent you at bond hearings to secure release.

– Build a strong case using expert witnesses, like toxicologists, to dispute drug quantities, knowledge of the luggage’s contents or intent.

At Peach State Law firm, our team of eight attorneys has deep knowledge of airport procedures, Georgia drug laws, and Clayton County courts. We’ve successfully defended clients in similar situations, often achieving dismissals, acquittals, or minimized penalties. We know the ins and outs of Atlanta Police Department’s standard operating procedures and how to leverage them in your favor.

Take the Next Step: Contact Us Today

If you or a family member is facing marijuana trafficking charges at ATL, don’t wait—the sooner you act, the better your chances. We’re available 24/7, including weekends, to provide immediate guidance. Call Peach State Lawyer at 404-581-0999 or visit our website at www.peachstatelawyer.com to schedule a confidential consultation. Let us fight for your rights and help you move forward. Your future depends on it.

Theft Crimes in Gwinnett County

Theft charges can arise in several different ways, but the two most common are theft by taking and theft by receiving stolen property.

Theft By Taking

Theft by taking occurs when a person is accused of unlawfully taking property that belongs to another person with the intent to deprive that other person of their property. Theft by taking is defined by statute in O.C.G.A. §16-8-2. “Deprive” means to withhold property of another permanently or temporarily or to dispose of the property to make it unlikely that the owner will recover it. The value of the property is only important when it comes to sentencing.

If the value of the property is less than $1,500.00, the case will be charged as a misdemeanor, and a person could be sentenced up to 12 months in custody. If the value of the property is $1,500.01 to $5,000.00, the case will be charged as a felony, and a person could be sentenced up to 5 years in custody. If the value of the property is $5,000.01 to $25,000.00, the case will be charged as a felony, and a person could be sentenced up to 10 years in custody. For property valued over $25,000, the potential sentence is 20 years in custody.

Theft By Receiving Stolen Property

Theft by receiving stolen property occurs when a person receives, disposes of, or retains property that a person knows or should know is stolen. Knowledge is a required element of theft by receiving. This means that the government must prove that the person they are charging knew that the property was stolen.

Just like theft by taking, the value of the property determines the potential sentencing. If the value of the property is less than $1,500.00, the case will be charged as a misdemeanor, and a person could be sentenced up to 12 months in custody. If the value of the property is $1,500.01 to $5,000.00, the case will be charged as a felony, and a person could be sentenced up to 5 years in custody. If the value of the property is $5,000.01 to $25,000.00, the case will be charged as a felony, and a person could be sentenced up to 10 years in custody. For property valued over $25,000, the potential sentence is 20 years in custody.

As you can see, theft charges can carry serious penalties. It is important to hire an experienced attorney if you are facing theft charges in Gwinnett County. The lawyers at W. Scott Smith, PC can review the evidence in your case and determine the best strategy for defending the case. Call our office at 404-581-0999 today for a free consultation.

 

Driving with a Suspended License in Forsyth County, Georgia: What You Need to Know

If you’re caught driving with a suspended license in Forsyth County, Georgia, the consequences can be severe. Georgia law treats this offense seriously, and penalties escalate with each subsequent violation.

According to Georgia Code §40-5-121, the penalties for driving with a suspended or revoked license depend on the number or prior convictions within the past five years:

First Offense punishment:

  • No less than 2 days in jail
  • A fine of $500 to $1000
  • You could also be placed on probation

Second or Third Offense punishment:

  • No less than 10 days in jail
  • A fine of $1000 to $2500
  • You could also be placed on probation

Fourth Offense punishment:

  • Considered a felony
  • 1 to 5 years in jail
  • Fines
  • Probation

Driving with a suspended license in Forsyth County, Georgia, is a serious offense with significant legal consequences. If you’re facing charges, consult the qualified lawyers at W. Scott Smith, P.C. to understand your options. Call us at 404-581-0999 for a free consultation.

Probation Violation

In Georgia, a common consequence after a conviction of either a misdemeanor or a felony is a term of probation. A separate proceeding may occur if the accused, after conviction of a crime, violates his/her probationary conditions. This separate proceeding is called a probation revocation.

When an accused is sentenced to probation, he/she is usually required to comply with certain conditions in order to successfully complete probation. If these conditions are not strictly complied with, it may result in his/her probation being revoked. Common probationary terms include, but are not limited to:

  • Regular reporting to a probation officer
  • Maintaining a job while on probation
  • No contact orders
  • Loss of gun rights
  • Drug counseling and treatment
  • Community service hours
  • Restitution to the victim
  • Random alcohol and drug screens
  • No new arrests

In Georgia, there are essentially three ways to violate probation:

  1. Technical Violations: This occurs when the probationer fails to meet a technical condition of his/her probation such as failing to pay restitution to the victim, failing to report to his/her probation officer, or failing to pay fines associated with probation.
  2. Special Condition Violation: This means that the probationer failed to comply with special conditions, which were imposed by the judge on the probationer, such as failing to comply with random drug screens or drug counseling.
  3. Substantive Violations: This occurs when the probationer was arrested for committing another criminal offense while on probation. In Georgia, this is usually the most serious violation of probation and could potentially revoke the probationary term and require the probationer to serve the rest of his/her remaining sentence in jail or prison.

When one of these probation violations occurs, the probation officer may file a petition to revoke the term of probation and notify the probationer of his/her intentions to do so. If this occurs, there will be a hearing called a “probation revocation” hearing to determine whether the probation will be revoked and the consequences of that revocation.

Due to the possibility of jail time if a person’s probation is revoked, it is of vital importance to hire an experienced criminal defense attorney who understands all possible options when dealing with probation violations. Here, at the Law Offices of W. Scott Smith, our attorneys are skilled and knowledgeable about these proceedings and we advocate tirelessly for our clients and their constitutional rights. Therefore, if you have an active probation warrant or are at risk of your probation being revoked, please call our office today at 404-581-0999 for a free consultation.

Geofence Warrants and Your Privacy Rights in Dekalb County

Imagine waking up one morning to discover that law enforcement knows exactly where you were on a given night, not because they obtained a warrant for your specific phone, but because they swept up location data from every device in a particular area at a particular time. This is not science fiction; it is the reality of geofence warrants issued in Dekalb County, an increasingly common investigative tool that raises profound questions about privacy, technology, and the Fourth Amendment.

A geofence warrant is a court order that requires technology companies—most often Google—to sift through historical location data from all devices within a defined geographic boundary (the “geofence”) during a specified time period. Rather than naming a suspect or a particular device, Dekalb County prosecutors describe the boundaries of a crime scene or other relevant area on a map and ask for the location “pings” of every smartphone, tablet, or wearable that was present there. The intent is to identify potential suspects whose devices moved into the geofenced area at the relevant time.

On their face, geofence warrants appear to be a powerful tool for locating suspects in serious crimes. However, they come with a significant trade‑off: massive data collection. By design, these warrants scoop up information on innocent people—journalists visiting a protest, bystanders walking through a park, or someone on an errand near the crime scene. Gathering such broad swaths of private data infringes on the constitutional protection against unreasonable searches in Dekalb County.

 

The Fourth Amendment guarantees that people have the right “to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures.” Traditional warrants describe a particular person or place with specificity; a geofence warrant, by contrast, asks for every device in a wide area. Courts have struggled to reconcile this tension. In the 2018 Supreme Court decision Carpenter v. United States, the Court held that accessing historical cell‑site location information generally requires a warrant supported by probable cause. Although Carpenter did not directly address geofence warrants, it set the stage for heightened scrutiny of digital‑age searches.

In a typical scenario, a Dekalb County investigator investigating a burglary or assault will outline on a digital map the location and time frame of the crime. The warrant is served on a technology company, like Google, which compiles a list of device identifiers—known as “anonymous identifiers”—that pinged the defined area during that window. Law enforcement then reviews metadata such as device movement patterns and, in some cases, supplementary information like Google profile data or Wi‑Fi network connections. From this list, Dekalb County investigators narrow down their focus to devices whose behavior suggests involvement, then seek further warrants to unmask the individual owners.

Because geofence warrants collect data indiscriminately, they inevitably sweep in bystanders. Someone who stopped for coffee near the scene, simply drove down the block, or where at home and live in the area can be subjected to scrutiny. This raises difficult questions: Should a person’s lawful presence near a public place be treated as probable cause for police investigation? Does the mere fact of carrying a smartphone turn every citizen into what the courts have begun calling a “digital witness” to crime? These are not idle concerns; the scale of modern data retention means that our digital footprints can be preserved for years, potentially exposing innocent, unknowing, and un-consenting people to legal trouble long after any alleged crime.

 

Defense attorneys have begun to push back by filing motions to suppress evidence obtained through geofence warrants. These challenges typically argue that such warrants are overbroad and violate the Fourth Amendment’s requirement of particularity. Some courts have responded by narrowing the scope of these warrants—limiting them to devices displaying “suspicious” behavior, such as remaining on site during the crime and then rapidly departing. Others have demanded more precise descriptions of suspects or more targeted time frames. Although the law in this area is still evolving, successful suppression motions can force Dekalb County prosecutors to either abandon digital leads or gather evidence through more traditional, narrowly tailored means.

 

If you are not under investigation, there are still steps you can take to safeguard your location information. Many smartphones allow you to disable or limit location history—Google’s “Location History” setting, for instance, can be turned off altogether. Using privacy‑minded navigation apps that do not store your data or setting your phone to clear location history automatically can also reduce the volume of data available for a geofence warrant. However, these measures are no panacea: even with location history disabled, apps that require location services (like weather or ride‑share apps) may still generate records. Ultimately, meaningful privacy protections will require a combination of personal vigilance, legislative reform, and judicial oversight.

Geofence warrants sit at the intersection of rapid technological change and constitutional law that has not kept pace. The drive to solve crimes more efficiently must be balanced against the fundamental right to privacy. As public awareness grows and defense attorneys, like us, continue to challenge the breadth of these warrants, jurists and legislators are being forced to confront questions that were unimaginable just a decade ago.

 

For now, if you value your privacy in Dekalb County, it pays to understand how geofence warrants work—and to take proactive steps to limit the trails you leave behind. When your digital footprint can be used to cast suspicion on you, your loved ones, friends and neighbors, staying informed becomes not just a matter of privacy, but of personal freedom.

DUI Consequences in Dunwoody Municipal Court

Georgia law, under O.C.G.A. § 40‑6‑391, prohibits operating a vehicle while:

  • Under the influence of alcohol, drugs, or inhalants to the point it’s unsafe to drive;
  • Having a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.08% or higher within three hours after driving;
  • Having any detectable amount of marijuana or other controlled substances in the blood or urine, regardless of alcohol presence.

If someone is found guilty of a DUI in Dunwoody, Georgia, under O.C.G.A. § 40-6-391, their driver’s license will be suspended. This isn’t optional—it’s a required suspension by the Georgia Department of Driver Services. How long the suspension lasts depends on how many DUIs the person has had in the last five years. Here’s how it breaks down:

         
Offense Classification Fines Jail Time Additional Requirements
1st DUI Misdemeanor $300 – $1,000 10 days – 12 months (min 24 hrs if BAC ≥ 0.08) At least 40 hours community service, DUI Risk Reduction Program, clinical evaluation, probation.
2nd DUI (within 10 yrs) Misdemeanor $600 – $1,000 90 days – 12 months (min 72 hrs) At least 30 days community service, DUI school, clinical evaluation, probation, possible publication of conviction.
3rd DUI (within 10 yrs) High and aggravated misdemeanor $1,000 – $5,000 15 days – 12 months (min 15 days) At least 30 days community service, DUI school, clinical evaluation, probation, license revocation, declared habitual violator.
4th+ DUI (within 10 yrs) Felony $1,000 – $5,000 1 – 5 years Felony charges, 5-year license revocation, probation for remainder of sentence.

 

If you or a loved one has been charged with DUI in Dunwoody, don’t face it alone. The experienced legal team at W. Scott Smith, P.C. is here to help. We offer a free consultation to discuss your case and protect your rights.

Help! I Failed to Appear in Roswell Municipal Court!

If you missed court in Roswell Municipal Court, you are likely in FTA status. This means that you failed to appear for your court date, and it is probable that your driver’s license has been suspended. The tricky thing about FTAs is that you likely don’t even know that you missed court until you are pulled over and an officer tells you that your license is suspended.

The court will not lift your FTA suspension until you deal with the underlying traffic charge. This could mean just paying a fine, but it may also require an in-court appearance. An experienced lawyer can help you navigate the process quickly and effectively and get you on the road to reinstating your license.

The lawyers at W. Scott Smith are experienced at helping clients resolve FTAs and guiding clients in the best way to resolve the underlying traffic charge. Call us today at 404-581-0999 for a free consultation on how to move forward, resolve the FTA, and have your driver’s license reinstated.

Geofence Warrants and Your Privacy Rights in Fulton County

Imagine waking up one morning to discover that law enforcement knows exactly where you were on a given night, not because they obtained a warrant for your specific phone, but because they swept up location data from every device in a particular area at a particular time. This is not science fiction; it is the reality of geofence warrants issued in Fulton County, an increasingly common investigative tool that raises profound questions about privacy, technology, and the Fourth Amendment.

A geofence warrant is a court order that requires technology companies—most often Google—to sift through historical location data from all devices within a defined geographic boundary (the “geofence”) during a specified time period. Rather than naming a suspect or a particular device, Fulton County prosecutors describe the boundaries of a crime scene or other relevant area on a map and ask for the location “pings” of every smartphone, tablet, or wearable that was present there. The intent is to identify potential suspects whose devices moved into the geofenced area at the relevant time.

On their face, geofence warrants appear to be a powerful tool for locating suspects in serious crimes. However, they come with a significant trade‑off: massive data collection. By design, these warrants scoop up information on innocent people—journalists visiting a protest, bystanders walking through a park, or someone on an errand near the crime scene. Gathering such broad swaths of private data infringes on the constitutional protection against unreasonable searches in Fulton County.

 

The Fourth Amendment guarantees that people have the right “to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures.” Traditional warrants describe a particular person or place with specificity; a geofence warrant, by contrast, asks for every device in a wide area. Courts have struggled to reconcile this tension. In the 2018 Supreme Court decision Carpenter v. United States, the Court held that accessing historical cell‑site location information generally requires a warrant supported by probable cause. Although Carpenter did not directly address geofence warrants, it set the stage for heightened scrutiny of digital‑age searches.

In a typical scenario, a Fulton County investigator investigating a burglary or assault will outline on a digital map the location and time frame of the crime. The warrant is served on a technology company, like Google, which compiles a list of device identifiers—known as “anonymous identifiers”—that pinged the defined area during that window. Law enforcement then reviews metadata such as device movement patterns and, in some cases, supplementary information like Google profile data or Wi‑Fi network connections. From this list, Fulton County investigators narrow down their focus to devices whose behavior suggests involvement, then seek further warrants to unmask the individual owners.

Because geofence warrants collect data indiscriminately, they inevitably sweep in bystanders. Someone who stopped for coffee near the scene, simply drove down the block, or where at home and live in the area can be subjected to scrutiny. This raises difficult questions: Should a person’s lawful presence near a public place be treated as probable cause for police investigation? Does the mere fact of carrying a smartphone turn every citizen into what the courts have begun calling a “digital witness” to crime? These are not idle concerns; the scale of modern data retention means that our digital footprints can be preserved for years, potentially exposing innocent, unknowing, and un-consenting people to legal trouble long after any alleged crime.

 

Defense attorneys have begun to push back by filing motions to suppress evidence obtained through geofence warrants. These challenges typically argue that such warrants are overbroad and violate the Fourth Amendment’s requirement of particularity. Some courts have responded by narrowing the scope of these warrants—limiting them to devices displaying “suspicious” behavior, such as remaining on site during the crime and then rapidly departing. Others have demanded more precise descriptions of suspects or more targeted time frames. Although the law in this area is still evolving, successful suppression motions can force Fulton County prosecutors to either abandon digital leads or gather evidence through more traditional, narrowly tailored means.

 

If you are not under investigation, there are still steps you can take to safeguard your location information. Many smartphones allow you to disable or limit location history—Google’s “Location History” setting, for instance, can be turned off altogether. Using privacy‑minded navigation apps that do not store your data or setting your phone to clear location history automatically can also reduce the volume of data available for a geofence warrant. However, these measures are no panacea: even with location history disabled, apps that require location services (like weather or ride‑share apps) may still generate records. Ultimately, meaningful privacy protections will require a combination of personal vigilance, legislative reform, and judicial oversight.

Geofence warrants sit at the intersection of rapid technological change and constitutional law that has not kept pace. The drive to solve crimes more efficiently must be balanced against the fundamental right to privacy. As public awareness grows and defense attorneys, like us, continue to challenge the breadth of these warrants, jurists and legislators are being forced to confront questions that were unimaginable just a decade ago.

 

For now, if you value your privacy in Fulton County, it pays to understand how geofence warrants work—and to take proactive steps to limit the trails you leave behind. When your digital footprint can be used to cast suspicion on you, your loved ones, friends and neighbors, staying informed becomes not just a matter of privacy, but of personal freedom.

Georgia’s New Survivor Justice Act

It is not uncommon that we see a person accused of a violent act against a person that has long been their abuser. Up until now, a prior history of being a victim of domestic violence would not necessarily justify a violent act towards one’s abuser. A new Georgia law, The Georgia Survivor Justice Act (HB 582) is a transformative measure designed to acknowledge the realities of trauma and abuse faced by survivors of domestic violence and child abuse- and to adjust the criminal justice system accordingly.

Key Provisions of the Act

  1. Expanded Self‑Defense and Justification
  • Survivors can now expand how they present self‑defense claims. Instead of requiring a defendant to prove that they were in fear of imminent harm, a defendant can explain the history of abuse to justify their actions. Evidence of past abuse—such as police reports, medical records, eyewitness statements, and expert testimony—is admissible to explain defensive actions.
  1. Sentencing Mitigation and Structure
  • A major component of HB 582 is its sentencing reforms. Survivors can introduce evidence showing that abuse significantly contributed to their offenses to reduce sentences if they are convicted.
  1. Resentencing Pathway for Those Already Incarcerated (O.C.G.A. § 17‑10‑1(g)(2))

People currently serving sentences for offenses committed before July 1, 2025, may petition for resentencing:

  • Eligibility triggers include new evidence of abuse not introduced at the original sentencing or convictions predating the law’s effective date.
  • The law presumes favorably toward granting hearings unless the petition appears unreliable. Prosecutorial agreement expedites granting it.

Why Does This Matter for Criminal Defense?

  • Reframing the Narrative: HB 582 encourages criminal defense lawyers to build robust narratives that incorporate clients’ trauma and abusive histories—not just technical legal arguments.
  • Better Justice, Fairer Sentencing: Judges must now weigh abuse context in sentencing, offering room for more just outcomes, including earlier parole or reformative options.
  • Reflects Modern Understanding of Abuse: Recognizing that victims often act under prior trauma, HB 582 aligns Georgia’s justice system with current research and advocacy consensus.

The Survivor Justice Act marks a watershed moment in criminal defense, particularly for survivors of domestic violence and child abuse. By enabling courts to consider the full context of abuse in defense strategies, sentencing, and resentencing, the law ensures survivors’ actions are understood in light of the trauma they endured.

This legislation doesn’t just reform legal procedures—it humanizes the legal process. For criminal defense attorneys in Georgia, HB 582 is both a powerful tool and a mandate to elevate empathy and context in representing survivors. It’s a critical piece in ensuring justice truly serves those who need it most.

If you have been charged with a violent crime and feel that your actions were justified because you are a survivor of domestic violence, call us at 404-581-0999. We would be honored to represent you and help tell your story.

Why You Need an Attorney for a Bond Revocation and What Can Cause It

What Is Bond Revocation?

When someone is released from jail while awaiting trial, they do so under a legal agreement called a bond (or bail). This agreement typically includes strict terms and conditions that they must follow. Bond revocation happens when a judge decides that the person violated those terms and conditions.

Reasons a Bond Might Be Revoked

Several serious actions can lead to a judge to revoke bond. Below are some of the most frequent causes:

  1. Failure to Appear in Court
  2. New Criminal Charges
  3. Violation of Bond Conditions
  4. Tampering with Evidence or Witnesses
  5. Positive Drug or Alcohol Tests

You’re entitled to a hearing before your bond is revoked, but going into that hearing without an attorney puts you at a serious disadvantage. If you or someone you love is facing bond revocation.  The lawyers here at W. Scott Smith, P.C., will advocate on your behalf, present mitigating evidence, and challenge the state’s claims. Call us at 404-581-0999 for your free consultation today!